首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Emergy evaluation perspectives of a multipurpose dam proposal in Korea
【24h】

Emergy evaluation perspectives of a multipurpose dam proposal in Korea

机译:韩国多用途水坝提案的能值评估观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The 'emergy' concept was used to evaluate the economy of Korea and the contributions of a multipurpose dam proposal to the real wealth of the Korean economy. Emergy is defined as the available energy of one kind previously used up directly and indirectly to make a product or service. The indices for Korea calculated from the emergy evaluation were close to those of developed countries. Even though its monetary balance of payments was negative in 1997, the economy of Korea showed positive balance in trade when exports and imports were expressed in emergy. The emergy evaluation showed that the Korean economy places a large stress on its environment. Water supply and generation of electricity were the most important contributions of the proposed dam in terms of emergy; 46.5 and 45.1% of the total benefit, respectively. Flood control contributed 8.4% of the total benefit. Major costs associated with the proposed dam were from sediments (33.2% of the total cost), construction services (22.8%), and social disruption of the region (21.6%). In terms of emergy, the ratio of benefits to costs of the proposed dam was 2.78 if sediments are not included, and 1.86 if sediments are included, which result in more benefits than costs in both cases. The benefit to cost ratio of the dam was larger than that of the current system (1.42) without the dam whether sediments are included in the total cost or not. The environmental stress of the proposed dam was considerably lower than that of the Korean economy, but the dam might increase stress on local environment.
机译:“能值”概念用于评估韩国的经济以及多功能水坝提案对韩国经济实际财富的贡献。能值被定义为先前直接或间接用完以生产产品或服务的一种可用能量。从能值评估中得出的韩国指数与发达国家的指数相近。尽管1997年其国际收支的货币差额为负,但当出口和进口以能值表示时,韩国经济仍显示出正贸易平衡。能值评估表明,韩国经济对其环境造成了很大压力。就能值而言,供水和发电是拟建水坝的最重要贡献。分别占总收益的46.5%和45.1%。防洪贡献了总收益的8.4%。与拟建水坝相关的主要成本来自沉积物(占总成本的33.2%),建筑服务(22.8%)和该地区的社会破坏(21.6%)。在能值方面,如果不包括沉积物,拟建大坝的收益与成本之比为2.78,如果包括沉积物,则为1.86,这两种情况下的收益都大于成本。无论是否在总成本中包括沉积物,大坝的收益成本比都比不使用大坝的当前系统(1.42)大。拟建水坝的环境压力远低于韩国经济,但该水坝可能会增加对当地环境的压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号