首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Comparing the impacts of mitigation and non-mitigation on mountain pine beetle populations
【24h】

Comparing the impacts of mitigation and non-mitigation on mountain pine beetle populations

机译:比较缓解和不缓解措施对山松甲虫种群的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Mountain pine beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Hopkins) attack and can ultimately kill individuals and groups of pine trees, specifically lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex. Loud var. latifolia Engl.). In British Columbia, beetle attack has increased from 164 000 ha in 1999 to over 13 million ha in 2008. Mitigation efforts can play a key role in addressing the impact beetle infestations can have on the forested landscape. In this research, the impact of mitigation on a mountain pine beetle infestation is examined within a network of 28 research plots where sanitation harvesting was completed (10 mitigated plots) and not completed (18 unmitigated plots). Three forest stand level modelling scenarios which predict the number of attacked trees, based on current infestation within the plots, were utilized to compare the differences between mitigated and non-mitigated plots. In the first scenario in the non-mitigated plots, 125 trees were infested after 10 years, while in the mitigated plots no trees were infested in the same time period. The second scenario indicates the level of mitigation required to suppress beetle infestations where the proportion of mitigated trees was calculated for each plot by counting the residual attack and the number of mitigated trees. The average mitigation rate over all plots of 43% (range 0 -100%) is not sufficient to provide control. In the non-mitigated plots, the average population expansion rate was 5 (range of 0-18) which requires a detection accuracy of 74% to reliably detect infestation. The third scenario estimated the length of time required for ongoing detection, monitoring, and mitigation to bring an infestation under control. If mitigation efforts were maintained at the current rate of 43%, the beetle population would not be adequately controlled. However, when aided by continued detection and monitoring of attacked trees, mitigation rates greater than 50% are sufficient to control infestations, especially with persistent implementation, aided by continued detection and monitoring of infested trees.
机译:山松甲虫,黄松树(Doproctonus pokerosae,Hopkins)会攻击并最终杀死个体和成群的松树,特别是刺杆松(Pinus contorta Dougl。ex。Loud var。latifolia Engl。)。在不列颠哥伦比亚省,甲虫的袭击已从1999年的16.4万公顷增加到2008年的1300万公顷。在解决甲虫侵扰对森林景观的影响方面,减灾工作可以发挥关键作用。在这项研究中,在28个研究用地的网络中,研究了缓解措施对松树甲虫侵扰的影响,这些研究用地的采摘工作已经完成(10个缓解地带)而未完成(18个未缓解地带)。利用三种林分级建模方案,根据地块内的当前侵袭情况预测受攻击的树木数量,以比较减缓和未减缓的地块之间的差异。在未减缓地块的第一种情况下,十年后侵染了125棵树,而在减缓地块中,同一时期没有树被侵染。第二种情况表明了抑制甲虫侵扰所需的缓解水平,其中通过计算剩余攻击次数和减轻树的数量为每个地块计算减轻树的比例。所有地块的平均缓解率达43%(范围0 -100%)不足以提供控制。在未缓解的地块中,平均种群扩展率为5(范围为0-18),这需要74%的检测精度才能可靠地检测出侵扰。第三种情况估计了持续进行检测,监视和缓解所需的时间,以使感染得以控制。如果将缓解措施维持在目前的43%的水平,则甲虫种群将无法得到充分控制。但是,在持续检测和监测受灾树木的帮助下,大于50%的缓解率足以控制侵染,尤其是在持续实施的情况下,通过持续检测和监测受侵害树木的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号