...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Simulating the influence of integrated crop-livestock systems on water yield at watershed scale
【24h】

Simulating the influence of integrated crop-livestock systems on water yield at watershed scale

机译:在流域范围内模拟作物-畜牧综合系统对水产量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Integrated crop-livestock (ICL) systems are being promoted as environmentally favorable alternatives to traditional crop agriculture and livestock production. There are few, if any, evaluation studies of the hydrologic response of watersheds to the implementation of ICL systems. Thus, we applied the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model to simulate the potential impacts of ICL systems on water yield and its hydrological components using a large agricultural dominated watershed. In this study, the integration of grazing operations with cropping systems represented cattle grazing under three typical crop rotations: (i) continuous corn (Zea mays L.; 1-year rotation), (ii) conventional (corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]; 2-year rotation), and (iii) winter cover crops (corn-soybean-oats (Avena sativa L.)/winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.); 3-year rotation). Modeling results showed a significant reduction in water yield over a long-term period simulation (31 years) when grazing of corn residue or winter barley was scheduled within the rotations. When compared to scenarios without grazing operations, the reduction in water yield was 14.7% under corn-soybean rotation (corn as the forage grazed), 12.5% under continuous corn rotation, 6.4% under corn-soybean-oats/winter barley rotation (corn as the forage grazed), and 3% under corn-soybean-oats/winter barley rotation (winter barley as the forage grazed). Of the three components that constitute water yield (Le., surface runoff, lateral and groundwater flow), only surface runoff was reduced when integrating grazing into the cropping system. Instead, lateral and groundwater flows increased when ICL systems were scheduled in the watershed. Groundwater flow was the hydrological component with the highest relative impact on streamflow. These results indicate that ICL systems can positively affect processes involved in soil water storage and transit. Runoff reduction benefits of ICL systems might be helpful in improving the environmental quality of receiving waterbodies and in reducing flood-risk potential. These systems over the long-term could benefit the watershed's hydrological cycle through increased baseflow. Overall, this study suggests new watershed-scale benefits of ICL systems with important hydrological implications that might be of interest for agricultural watershed planners.
机译:集成的农作物-畜牧业(ICL)系统正在作为传统农作物和畜牧生产的对环境有利的替代品而得到推广。关于流域对实施ICL系统的水文响应的评估研究很少(如果有的话)。因此,我们使用土壤和水评估工具(SWAT)模型来模拟ICL系统对一个以农业为主的大流域的水产量及其水文成分的潜在影响。在这项研究中,放牧作业与种植系统的整合代表了牛在三种典型的作物轮作下放牧:(i)连续玉米(Zea mays L .;一年轮作),(ii)常规(玉米-大豆[Glycine max( L.)Merr。];轮作2年),和(iii)冬季覆盖作物(玉米-大豆-燕麦(Avena sativa L。)/大麦(Hordeum vulgare L。); 3年轮换)。建模结果显示,在轮作期间安排放牧玉米残渣或大麦时,在长期模拟(31年)中,水的产量显着下降。与不放牧的情况相比,玉米-大豆轮作(饲草吃草)下的水产量降低了14.7%,连续玉米轮作下的水产量降低了12.5%,玉米-大豆-燕麦/大麦冬轮换下的水产量降低了6.4%(玉米) (草料为草料),玉米-大豆-燕麦/冬大麦轮作下为3%(草料为冬大麦)。在构成水产量的三个组成部分(例如,地表径流,侧向和地下水流量)中,将放牧纳入耕作系统后,只有地表径流减少了。相反,当在流域中安排ICL系统时,横向和地下水流量增加。地下水流量是对水流影响最大的水文要素。这些结果表明,ICL系统可以对土壤水存储和运输过程产生积极影响。 ICL系统减少径流的好处可能有助于改善接收水体的环境质量并减少潜在的洪灾风险。从长远来看,这些系统可以通过增加基流来使流域的水文循环受益。总的来说,这项研究表明,ICL系统具有新的分水岭规模效益,具有重要的水文意义,农业分水岭规划者可能会感兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号