首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >LCA of waste prevention activities: A case study for drinking water in Italy
【24h】

LCA of waste prevention activities: A case study for drinking water in Italy

机译:废物预防活动的生命周期评估:以意大利的饮用水为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The strategic relevance of waste prevention has considerably increased worldwide during recent years, such that the current European legislation requires the preparation of national waste prevention programmes in which reduction objectives and measures are identified. In such a context, it is possible to recognise how, in order to correctly evaluate the environmental consequences of a prevention activity, a life cycle perspective should be employed. This allows us to go beyond the simple reduction of the generated waste which, alone, does not automatically imply achieving better overall environmental performance, especially when this reduction is not pursued through the simple reduction of consumption. In this study, the energetic and environmental performance of two waste prevention activities considered particularly meaningful for the Italian context were evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The two activities were the utilisation of public network water (two scenarios) and of refillable bottled water (two scenarios) for drinking purposes, instead of one-way bottled water (three scenarios). The energy demand and specific potential impacts of the four waste prevention scenarios and of the three baseline scenarios were compared with the aim of evaluating whether, and under what conditions, the analysed prevention activities are actually associated with overall energetic and environmental benefits. In typical conditions, the use of public network water directly from the tap results in the best scenario, while if water is withdrawn from public fountains, its further transportation by private car can involve significant impacts. The use of refillable PET bottled water seems the preferable scenario for packaged water consumption, if refillable bottles are transported to local distributors along the same (or a lower) distance as one-way bottles to retailers. The use of refillable glass bottled water is preferable to one-way bottled water only if a distance beneath 150 km separates bottling plants from local distributors and retailers (except for eutrophication indicator which is always slightly worse). To reduce waste generation and to achieve meaningful potential savings of natural resources, energy and greenhouse gas emissions, a reduction in one-way bottled water consumption in Italy is recommended in favour of the use of public network water and of the establishment of short distance-PET bottles based refilling systems. The development of closed loop recycling of one-way PET bottles, and especially the reduction of the distance along which one-way bottled water is transported, are also important.
机译:近年来,全球范围内废物预防的战略相关性已大大提高,因此,当前的欧洲立法要求制定国家废物预防计划,在其中确定减少目标和措施。在这种情况下,有可能认识到,为了正确地评估预防活动的环境后果,应如何运用生命周期观点。这使我们不仅可以简单地减少所产生的废物,而不能单独自动地实现更好的整体环境绩效,尤其是当不通过简单地减少消耗来实现这种减少时。在这项研究中,使用生命周期评估(LCA)方法评估了对意大利而言特别有意义的两项废物预防活动的能源和环境绩效。两项活动是使用公共网络水(两种方案)和可再装瓶装水(两种方案)用于饮用,而不是单向瓶装水(三种方案)。比较了四个废物预防方案和三个基准方案的能源需求和特定的潜在影响,目的是评估分析的预防活动是否以及在什么条件下实际上与总体的能源和环境效益相关。在典型情况下,在最佳情况下直接使用自来水会产生公共网络水,而如果从公共喷泉中抽水,则私家车进一步运输水可能会产生重大影响。如果将可再装瓶沿与单向瓶相同(或更短)的距离运输到本地分销商,那么使用可再装PET瓶装水似乎是包装用水的最佳方案。仅当距离装瓶厂与当地分销商和零售商之间的距离小于150 km时,才使用可再装玻璃瓶装水而不是单向瓶装水(富营养化指标总是稍差一些)。为了减少废物的产生并实现自然资源,能源和温室气体排放的潜在潜在节省,建议减少意大利的单向瓶装水消耗,以利于使用公共网络水和建立短距离的基于PET瓶的填充系统。单向PET瓶的闭环再循环的发展,尤其是缩短单向瓶装水的输送距离,也很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号