【24h】

Green clubs

机译:绿色俱乐部

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper treats programs in which firms voluntarily agree to meet environmental standards as "green clubs": clubs, because they provide non-rival but excludable reputation benefits to participating firms; green, because they also generate environmental public goods. The model illuminates a central tension between the congestion externality familiar from conventional club theory and the free-riding externality familiar from the theory on private provision of public goods. We compare three common program sponsors—governments, industry, and environmental groups. We find that if monitoring of the club standard is perfect, a government constrained from regulating club size may prefer to leave sponsorship to industry if public-good benefits are sufficiently low, or to environmentalists if public-good benefits are sufficiently high. If monitoring is imperfect, an important question is whether consumers can infer that a club is too large for its standard to be credible. If they can then the government may deliberately choose an imperfect monitoring mechanism as a way of regulating club size indirectly. If they cannot then this reinforces the government's preference for delegating sponsorship.
机译:本文将企业自愿同意满足环境标准的计划称为“绿色俱乐部”:俱乐部,因为它们为参与企业提供非竞争性但排他的声誉收益;绿色,因为它们还产生环境公益物。该模型阐明了传统俱乐部理论所熟悉的拥挤外部性与私人产品公共提供理论所熟悉的搭便车外部性之间的中心张力。我们比较了三个常见的计划发起者-政府,行业和环境团体。我们发现,如果对俱乐部标准的监控是完美的,则如果公共利益不足够低,则受制于限制俱乐部规模的政府可能更愿意将赞助留给行业,而如果公共利益充分得高,则倾向于环保。如果监控不完善,那么一个重要的问题是,消费者是否可以推断出俱乐部太大,以至于其标准不可信。如果有条件的话,政府可能会故意选择一种不完善的监督机制,作为间接调节俱乐部规模的一种方式。如果他们不能这样做,那么这将加强政府对委派赞助的偏好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号