首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power >Assessment of Cavitation Models for Flows in Diesel Injectors With Single- and Two-Fluid Approaches
【24h】

Assessment of Cavitation Models for Flows in Diesel Injectors With Single- and Two-Fluid Approaches

机译:用单流体和两流体方法评估柴油机喷油嘴空化模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several recent cavitation models for the analysis of two-phase flows in diesel injectors with single- and two-fluid modeling approaches have been evaluated, including the Saha-Abu-Ramandan-Li (SAL), Schnerr-Sauer (SS), and Zwart-Gerber-Belamri (ZGB) models. The SAL model is a single-fluid model, while the other two models have been implemented with both single- and two-fluid approaches. Numerical predictions are compared with experimental results available in literature, qualitatively with experimental images of two-phase flow in an optically accessible nozzle, and quantitatively with measured mass flow rates and velocity profiles. It is found that at low injection pressure differentials there can be considerable discrepancy in the predictions of the vapor distribution from the three models considered. This discrepancy is reduced as the injection pressure differential is increased. Implementation of the SS and ZGB models with single- and two-fluid approaches yields noticeable differences in the results because of the relative velocity between the two phases, with two-fluid approach providing better agreement with experimental results. The performance of the SS and ZGB models implemented with the two-fluid approach is comparable with the SAL single-fluid model, but with significantly more computational time. Overall, the SAL single-fluid model performs comparatively better with respect to the other two models.
机译:已经评估了几种最近的以单流体和双流体建模方法分析柴油喷射器两相流的气蚀模型,包括Saha-Abu-Ramandan-Li(SAL),Schnerr-Sauer(SS)和Zwart -Gerber-Belamri(ZGB)模型。 SAL模型是单流体模型,而其他两个模型已经使用单流体方法和双流体方法实现。将数值预测与文献中提供的实验结果进行比较,定性地将其与光学可访问喷嘴中的两相流的实验图像进行比较,并与测得的质量流速和速度曲线进行定量比较。发现在低喷射压力差下,从所考虑的三个模型对蒸气分布的预测中可能存在相当大的差异。随着喷射压力差的增加,该差异减小。由于两相之间的相对速度,使用单流体方法和双流体方法实施SS和ZGB模型会在结果上产生明显的差异,而双流体方法则与实验结果更好地吻合。用双流体方法实现的SS和ZGB模型的性能可与SAL单流体模型相媲美,但计算时间却大得多。总体而言,相对于其他两个模型,SAL单流体模型的性能相对更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号