首页> 外文期刊>Journal of engineering education >State of Qualitative Research in Engineering Education: Meta-Analysis of JEE Articles, 2005-2006
【24h】

State of Qualitative Research in Engineering Education: Meta-Analysis of JEE Articles, 2005-2006

机译:工程教育的定性研究现状:JEE文章的荟萃分析,2005-2006年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With recent calls for expanding the scope and rigor of engineering education research, use of qualitative methods to answer research questions that can not be answered through quantitative methods is taking on increasing significance. Well-designed qualitative studies often build on epistemological consistency across theoretical perspectives, research questions, and research methods. We examine recent articles published in the Journal of Engineering Education to determine the overall prevalence of qualitative articles and the extent to which they appear epistemo-logically and methodologically consistent with the goals of qualitative inquiry. We find that there are very few qualitative articles published, and even fewer which show epistemological consistency across different aspects of the research design. These issues may limit the rich, descriptive information that could be gained from qualitative inquiry, limiting the contributions qualitative studies could make to engineering education. We call on researchers to expand their use of qualitative methods and to design their studies with careful attention to epistemological consistency across the design.
机译:随着最近扩大工程教育研究范围和严格性的呼吁,使用定性方法来回答无法通过定量方法解决的研究问题变得越来越重要。设计良好的定性研究通常建立在跨理论观点,研究问题和研究方法的认识论一致性上。我们检查了最近发表在《工程教育杂志》上的文章,以确定定性文章的总体流行程度,以及它们在认识论,方法论上与定性探究目标一致的程度。我们发现发表的定性文章很少,而在研究设计的各个方面都表现出认识论​​上的一致性的文章甚至更少。这些问题可能会限制从定性探究中获得的丰富的描述性信息,从而限制了定性研究对工程教育的贡献。我们呼吁研究人员扩大定性方法的使用范围,并在设计时认真注意认识论在整个设计中的一致性,以进行研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号