首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Energy Storage >Comparative study on thermal runaway of commercial 14500, 18650 and 26650 LiFePO_4 batteries used in electric vehicles
【24h】

Comparative study on thermal runaway of commercial 14500, 18650 and 26650 LiFePO_4 batteries used in electric vehicles

机译:电动汽车商业14500,18650和26650 Lifepo_4电池的热失控比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

LiFePO4 batteries are widely regarded as safe. However, electric bus fires caused by overheating of LiFePO4 batteries have been reported. In this study, a pseudoadiabatic instrument was used to verify the thermal run-aways of IFR 14500, A123 18650, A123 26650, and SONY 26650 cylindrical LiFePO4 lithium-ion batteries charged to 3.8 or 4.2V. At runaway maximum temperature lower than the auto-ignition temperature of electrolyte, both 14500 and 18650 LiFePO4 batteries were determined to be safer than 26650 batteries. The crucial temperatures for 26650 batteries are in the range of 240 280 degrees C with a self-heat rate exceeding 100 degrees C min(-1). These high self-heat rates were not observed in 18650 and 14500 batteries. The effects of diameter on thermal runaway were visualized through the comparison of the runaway curves, crucial temperatures, maximum temperatures, maximum self-heat rates and total runaway energies of the batteries. The diameter effects on runaway hazards were investigated. The hazards of 26650 LiFePO4 batteries were caused by excessive heat because of internal short circuits above the crucial temperature, which were largely attributed to the collapse of the integrity of the separator. Therefore, the hazard of 26650 batteries is not caused by chemical activity.
机译:Lifepo4电池被广泛认为是安全的。然而,已经报道了由LiFepo4电池过热引起的电动总线火灾。在本研究中,使用伪装仪器来验证IFR 14500,A123 18650,A123 26650和索尼26650圆柱形LifePO4锂离子电池的IFR 14500,A123 18650,Carlium inclies。在Runaway最大温度下,低于电解质的自动点火温度,14500和18650 LiFePO4电池被确定为比26650电池更安全。 26650电池的关键温度在240 280℃的范围内,自热速率超过100摄氏度(-1)。在18650年和14500节电池中未观察到这些高自热率。通过比较失控曲线,关键的温度,最高温度,最大自热速率和电池的总失控能量,可视化直径对热失控的影响。研究了对失控危害的直径效应。由于高于关键温度的内部短路,26650 LiFepo4电池的危害是由过热引起的,这主要归因于分离器的完整性的塌陷。因此,26650次电池的危害不是由化学活性引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号