...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia >Does Specific Instruction During Collecting from Several Sources Affect the Quality of the Written Text Product?
【24h】

Does Specific Instruction During Collecting from Several Sources Affect the Quality of the Written Text Product?

机译:从多个来源收集期间的特定说明会影响书面文字产品的质量吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although academic writing is a complex interplay of comprehending and producing text the aspect of collecting information from source texts is hardly addressed in writing research. This study examined the impact of instructions supporting the collection process on writing quality, as well as the role of prior motivation and computer experience. University freshman had to compose a text by using sources with contradictory positions. Students of the experimental group received computer-based instructions on how to efficiently reduce information from source texts. They were compared to a control group without instructions. Collection quality was measured in terms of information units in the excerpt, while writing quality in the final text product was rated in terms of accuracy and coverage of evidence. The results show that the experimental group collected more information, but produced text products containing less relevant information than the control group. Unexpectedly, motivation did not influence writing performance while computer experience significantly affected writing quality in the control group.
机译:尽管学术写作是理解和产生文本的复杂相互作用,但是在写作研究中几乎没有解决从源文本收集信息的问题。这项研究检查了支持收集过程的指令对写作质量的影响,以及先验动机和计算机经验的作用。大学新生必须使用位置矛盾的资料来撰写文章。实验小组的学生收到了有关如何有效减少源文本信息的计算机指导。将他们与没有指示的对照组进行比较。摘录质量是根据摘录中的信息单位来衡量的,而最终文本产品中的书面质量是根据准确性和证据覆盖率来评估的。结果表明,实验组收集了更多的信息,但是生产的文本产品所包含的相关信息少于对照组。出乎意料的是,动机并没有影响写作表现,而计算机经验显着影响了对照组的写作质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号