首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Educational Administration >Building schools, rethinking quality? Early lessons from Los Angeles
【24h】

Building schools, rethinking quality? Early lessons from Los Angeles

机译:建设学校,重新思考质量?洛杉矶的早期课程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – Newly designed schools for centuries have projected fresh ideals regarding how children should learn and how human settlements should be organized. But under what conditions can forward-looking architects or education reformers trump the institutionalized practices of teachers or the political-economic constraints found within urban centers? The purpose of this paper is to ask how the designers of newly built schools in Los Angeles – midway into a $27 billion construction initiative – may help to rethink and discernibly lift educational quality. This may be accomplished via three causal pathways that may unfold in new schools: attracting a new mix of students, recruiting stronger teachers, or raising the motivation and performance of existing teachers and students. Design/methodology/approach – We track basic indicators of student movement and school quality over a five-year period (2002-2007) to understand whether gains do stem from new school construction. Qualitative field work and interviews further illuminate the mechanisms through which new schools may contribute to teacher motivation or student engagement. Findings – Initial evidence shows that many students, previously bussed out of the inner city due to overcrowding, have returned to smaller schools which are staffed by younger and more ethnically diverse teachers, and benefit from slightly smaller classes. Student achievement appears to be higher in new secondary schools that are much smaller in terms of enrollment size, compared with still overcrowded schools. Originality/value – We emphasize the importance of tracking student movement among schools and even across neighborhoods before attributing achievement differences to specific features of new schools, that is, guarding against selection bias. Whether new schools can hold onto, or attract new, middle-class families remains an open empirical question. Future research should also focus on the magnitude and social mechanisms through which new (or renovated) schools may attract varying mixes of students and teachers, and raise achievement.
机译:目的–几百年来新设计的学校就儿童应该如何学习以及如何组织人类住区提出了新的理想。但是,在什么情况下,具有前瞻性的建筑师或教育改革者可以胜过教师的制度化实践或城市中心的政治经济限制?本文的目的是询问洛杉矶新建学校的设计师(正在实施一项耗资270亿美元的建筑计划)如何帮助重新思考并明显提高教育质量。这可以通过新学校中可能出现的三个因果途径来实现:吸引新的学生组合,招募更强大的老师或提高现有师生的动力和绩效。设计/方法/方法–我们跟踪五年(2002-2007年)期间学生运动和学校质量的基本指标,以了解新学校的建设是否带来了收益。定性的现场工作和访谈进一步阐明了新学校可通过哪些机制促进教师的动机或学生的参与。调查结果–初步证据表明,许多学生以前因拥挤而被赶出内城,后来又回到了较小的学校,这些学校由年龄更小,种族更多的老师组成,并从较小的班级中受益。与仍然人满为患的学校相比,在招生规模较小的新中学中,学生的成绩似乎更高。原创性/价值–我们强调在将成绩差异归因于新学校的特定功能之前,即在防止选拔偏见之前,跟踪学生在学校之间甚至跨社区的运动的重要性。新学校能否保留还是吸引新的中产阶级家庭仍然是一个开放的经验问题。未来的研究还应关注新学校(或翻修过的学校)可通过其规模和社会机制吸引各种形式的学生和教师,并提高成绩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号