首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economics and Finance >A vector-autoregression analysis of credit and liquidity factor dynamics in US LIBOR and Euribor swap markets
【24h】

A vector-autoregression analysis of credit and liquidity factor dynamics in US LIBOR and Euribor swap markets

机译:美国LIBOR和Euribor掉期市场中信贷和流动性因素动态的矢量自回归分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We use a vector autoregressive approach to investigate the determinants of US Dollar LIBOR and Euribor swap spread variation during the 2007–2009 crisis in global credit and money markets. Using market-quoted yield and spread data from the highly liquid credit default swap (CDS) and overnight index swap (OIS) markets, we provide compelling empirical evidence that liquidity risk factor shocks have been the dominant drivers of the variation in swap spreads over this period. Our findings provide an explanation for the temporal differences that liquidity shocks have on swap spreads and provide a contemporary perspective on the dynamical interplay between credit-default and liquidity risk-factors in these markets. As all our risk-factor proxies are traded in liquid derivatives markets, our findings have implications for proprietary hedge fund traders hedging an exposure to swap-spread risk, for bank treasurers managing their liquidity requirements and for central bankers seeking to better understand the response of markets to their macroeconomic policy implementation and liquidity management actions. Indeed our markets-based analysis suggests that the European Central Bank (ECB) has underperformed relative to the Federal Reserve in terms of the differing levels of market confidence placed in its macroeconomic policy actions and remedial liquidity interventions during the period.
机译:我们使用向量自回归方法来调查2007年至2009年全球信贷和货币市场危机期间美元LIBOR和Euribor掉期利差变化的决定因素。使用来自高度流动的信用违约掉期(CDS)和隔夜指数掉期(OIS)市场的市场报价收益率和利差数据,我们提供了令人信服的经验证据,表明流动性风险因素冲击是掉期利差变化的主要驱动因素。期。我们的发现为流动性冲击对掉期利差的时间差异提供了解释,并为这些市场中信用违约和流动性风险因素之间的动态相互作用提供了当代视角。由于我们所有的风险因素代理都在流动性衍生品市场中交易,因此我们的发现对专有对冲基金交易员对冲掉期交易利差风险敞口,管理其流动性要求的银行财务主管以及寻求更好地理解金融市场反应的中央银行家具有重要意义。市场对其宏观经济政策的执行和流动性管理行动。实际上,我们的基于市场的分析表明,就此期间的宏观经济政策行动和补救性流动性干预措施而言,市场信心水平不同,因此欧洲中央银行(ECB)相对于美联储表现不佳。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Economics and Finance》 |2012年第2期|p.351-370|共20页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号