首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic studies >Do expectations and decisions respond to monetary policy?
【24h】

Do expectations and decisions respond to monetary policy?

机译:期望和决策是否对货币政策有所反应?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the ability of monetary policy to generate real effects in laboratory general equilibrium production economies. Design/methodology/approach - To understand why monetary policy is not consistently effective at stabilizing economic activity, the author vary the types of agents interacting in the economy and consider treatments where subjects are playing the role of households (firms) in an economy where automated firms (households) are programmed to behave rationally. Findings - While the majority of participants' expectations respond to monetary policy in the direction intended, subjects do form expectations adaptively, relying heavily on past variables and forecasts in forming two-steps-ahead forecasts. Moreover, in the presence of counterparts that are boundedly rational, forecast accuracy worsens significantly. When interacting with automated households, updating firms' prices respond modestly to monetary policy and significantly to anticipated marginal costs and future prices. The greatest deviations in behavior from theoretical predictions arise from human households (HH). Households persistent oversupply of labor and under-consumption is attributed to precautionary saving and debt aversion. The results provide evidence that the effects of monetary policy on decision making hinge on the distribution of indebtedness of households. Originality/value - The author present causal evidence of the effects of potential bounded rationality on agents' consumption and labor decisions.
机译:目的-本文的目的是探索货币政策在实验室一般均衡生产经济中产生实际影响的能力。设计/方法/方法-为了理解为什么货币政策在稳定经济活动方面不能始终有效,作者改变了经济中相互作用的主体类型,并考虑了在自动经济中主体扮演家庭(公司)角色的治疗方法公司(家庭)被编程为理性行为。研究结果-尽管大多数参与者的期望都按照预期的方向对货币政策做出了反应,但受试者的确适应性地形成了期望,在很大程度上取决于过去的变量和预测,从而形成了两步式的预测。此外,在存在相当有限的对应对象的情况下,预测准确性会大大降低。与自动化家庭互动时,更新公司的价格对货币政策的反应不大,对预期的边际成本和未来价格的反应也很大。行为与理论预测的最大偏差来自人类住户(HH)。家庭持续的劳动力过度供应和消费不足归因于预防性储蓄和避免债务。结果提供了证据,表明货币政策对决策的影响取决于家庭的债务分布。原创性/价值-作者提供了潜在有限理性对代理商的消费和劳动决策的影响的因果证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号