...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Psychology >A tax can nudge: The impact of an environmentally motivated bonus/malus fiscal system on transport preferences
【24h】

A tax can nudge: The impact of an environmentally motivated bonus/malus fiscal system on transport preferences

机译:税收可以推动:出于环境动机的奖金/恶意财务系统对交通偏好的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Bonus-malus taxes appear to have been successful in encouraging people to change to less polluting travel options in France (e.g. the tax on large and small engined cars). We hypothesize that they have three possible effects on consumer behaviour. The positive effects are: (1) a price effect (the less polluting option is subsidized and the polluting option is taxed); and (2) a social norm effect (the less polluting option is classified as pro-social and the polluting option as antisocial). The negative effect (3) is that they may decrease intrinsic motivation (crowding out). We provide an initial test of this tripartite model using survey data on students given a choice between taking the plane or the train between Toulouse to Paris. The first study shows that imposing a hypothetical bonus-malus tax has both a price effect (relative to a control condition where only the norm justifying the tax is presented) and a norm effect (relative to a control condition in which only the corresponding price difference is presented without mention of the tax). The second study presents a set of choices where the environmental norms and price differences are held constant, but the size of the contribution of the bonus-malus tax to the final price of each option is varied. This study confirms our prediction that a larger bonus-malus subsidy/tax reduces propensity to choose the less polluting option (i.e. the train). As the positive effects outweigh the negative effects in most of the choices studied, we conclude that bonus-malus taxes constitute a promising policy instrument.
机译:红利税似乎已经成功地鼓励了人们在法国改变污染较少的旅行选择(例如,对大型和小型发动机车征税)。我们假设它们对消费者行为具有三种可能的影响。积极的效果是:(1)价格效应(对污染程度较小的方案进行补贴,并对污染方案征税); (2)社会规范效应(污染程度较低的选项被分类为亲社会,污染选项为反社会)。负面影响(3)是,它们可能会降低内在动机(挤出)。我们使用对学生的调查数据对这种三方模型进行了初步测试,可以选择乘飞机还是在图卢兹到巴黎之间乘坐火车。第一项研究表明,施加假设的奖金-马尔鲁斯税既具有价格效应(相对于仅提出证明该税收合理性的控制条件),又具有规范效应(相对于仅具有相应价格差的控制条件)显示时未提及税额)。第二项研究提出了一组选择,在这些选择中,环境规范和价格差异保持不变,但红利税对每种选择的最终价格的贡献大小各不相同。这项研究证实了我们的预测,即较大的红利补贴/税款会降低选择污染较小的选项(即火车)的倾向。由于在大多数研究的选择中,积极的影响大于消极的影响,因此我们得出结论,奖金红利税构成了一种有前途的政策工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号