...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of economic perspectives >Overconfident Investors, Predictable Returns, and Excessive Trading
【24h】

Overconfident Investors, Predictable Returns, and Excessive Trading

机译:过度自信的投资者,可预测的收益和过度交易

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This essay has two main themes: 1) There are anomalies in financial markets-unprofitable active trading, and patterns of return predictability-that are puzzling from the perspective of traditional purely rational models; and 2) models of overcon-fidence, and of the dynamic psychological processes that underlie overconfidence, can plausibly explain why these patterns exist and persist. For those readers who are uncomfortable with an explanation for anomalies based on imperfect rationality, we would point out that the empirical patterns of unprofitable active trading and of return predictability are more-or-less agreed upon both by the leading fans of the efficient markets hypothesis and those with a more behavioral bent. For example, the data underlying the three- and five-factor models of Fama and French (1993; 2015) suggest that portfolios can be built that provide high returns with relatively low volatility. The main disagreement is not over the empirical facts described in this paper, but about what components should be added to an asset pricing model to describe them. We believe that overconfidence offers a useful component, both because of how it explains the agreed-upon facts emphasized here and also because overconfidence promises to help integrate other elements of behavioral finance theory. For example, some authors have emphasized the importance of investor disagreement in understanding financial markets (Hong and Stein 2007). Overconfidence provides a natural explanation for why investors who process the same public information end up disagreeing so much. Limited investor attention has also recently been offered as an explanation for various empirical patterns in trading and prices. Overconfidence explains why investors who neglect important information would nevertheless trade aggressively, so that such neglect can influence price. In these ways and others, overconfidence offers a microfoundation for other important building blocks of behavioral finance models.
机译:本文有两个主要主题:1)从传统的纯粹理性模型的角度来看,金融市场存在异常现象(无利可图的活跃交易和收益可预测性模式)。 2)过度自信的模型以及过度自信背后的动态心理过程可以合理地解释为什么这些模式存在并持续存在。对于那些不满意基于不完全合理性来解释异常的读者,我们将指出,有效市场假说的主要支持者或多或少都同意无利可图的活跃交易和收益可预测性的经验模式。以及那些有更多行为倾向的人。例如,Fama和French(1993; 2015)的三因素和五因素模型所依据的数据表明,可以建立能够以相对较低的波动率提供高回报的投资组合。主要的分歧不在于本文描述的经验事实,而是关于应在资产定价模型中添加哪些组件来描述它们的观点。我们认为,过度自信提供了有用的组成部分,这既因为它如何解释此处强调的共识事实,又因为过度自信有望帮助整合行为金融理论的其他要素。例如,一些作者强调了投资者意见分歧对理解金融市场的重要性(Hong and Stein 2007)。过度自信为处理相同公共信息的投资者为何最终如此不同意提供了自然的解释。最近还提供了有限的投资者关注,以解释交易和价格中的各种经验模式。过度自信解释了为什么忽略重要信息的投资者仍会积极交易,以致这种忽略会影响价格。通过这些方式以及其他方式,过度自信为行为财务模型的其他重要构建模块提供了微观基础。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The journal of economic perspectives》 |2015年第4期|61-87|共27页
  • 作者

    Kent Daniel; David Hirshleifer;

  • 作者单位

    Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City, New York National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts;

    Merage School of Business, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号