...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic issues >The French System of Direct and Indirect Family Transfers and the Principles of Justice
【24h】

The French System of Direct and Indirect Family Transfers and the Principles of Justice

机译:法国的直接和间接家庭转移制度与正义原则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Gosta Esping-Andersen's paradigmatic analysis of welfare capitalism (1990), the French welfare state is classified in the conservative corporatist regime. France is generally recognized as belonging to the Bismarckian family of welfare states because of the centrality of social insurance. In fact, most of benefits are earnings related and entitlement is conditional upon a contribution record. Social security contributions are paid by both employers and employees. However, in France, there is also a non-contributory element, a Beveridgean component. It refers to the tax-financed system and includes social assistance programs, minimum incomes and programs aimed at vocational training, and at integrating the young or long-term unemployed. These programs benefit those who do not have access to the social insurance system, such as the long-term unemployed or the young unemployed who have not contributed enough or have only a very short contribution period. Since the late 1970s, several kinds of minimum incomes or social minima have been set up to compensate for the failures of the Bismarckian sector (the social insurance system). There are at least eight different minimum incomes: minimum income for old people over sixty-five years, allowance for disabled adults, integration allowance, specific solidarity allowance, lone parent allowance, minimum income for disabled people (for those who have small invalidity insurance benefits), widowhood allowance, and minimum guaranteed income for adults over twenty-five years. These minimum incomes are granted with means tests. In the last three decades, the Beveridgean component has grown in a significant way. The economic crisis and the economic changes (more flexibility in the labor market and job insecurity) have brought about an increase in the number of people not covered by the social insurance system.
机译:在Gosta Esping-Andersen对福利资本主义的范式分析(1990年)中,法国福利国家被归类为保守的社团主义政权。由于社会保险的中心地位,法国通常被认为属于welfare斯麦福利国家大家庭。实际上,大多数福利与收入相关,而权利取决于缴款记录。社会保障金由雇主和雇员共同支付。但是,在法国,还有一个非贡献性元素,即贝弗里奇式分量。它是指税收资助的系统,包括社会援助计划,最低收入和旨在职业培训以及融合年轻或长期失业者的计划。这些方案使那些无法参加社会保险制度的人受益,例如长期失业者或缴费额不足或缴费期限很短的年轻失业者。自1970年代后期以来,已经建立了几种最低收入或最低社会标准,以弥补the斯麦部门(社会保险制度)的失败。至少有八种不同的最低收入:六十五岁以上的老年人的最低收入,成年残疾人的津贴,融合津贴,特别团结津贴,单亲父母津贴,残疾人的最低收入(对于那些拥有无效医疗保险金的人而言) ),丧偶津贴和25岁以上成年人的最低保证收入。这些最低收入通过经济状况调查来确定。在过去的三十年中,贝弗里奇兰成分取得了长足的发展。经济危机和经济变化(劳动力市场的更大灵活性和工作的不安全感)使社会保险体系未涵盖的人数有所增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号