...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization >Should I Stay or should I Go? Bandwagons in the lab
【24h】

Should I Stay or should I Go? Bandwagons in the lab

机译:我应该走还是留?实验室中的潮流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We experimentally investigate the impact of strategic uncertainty and complementarity on leader and follower behavior using the model of Farrell and Saloner (1985). At the core of the model are endogenous timing, irreversible actions and private valuations. We find that strategic complementarity strongly determines follower behavior. Once a subject decides to abandon the status quo the probability that other players jump on the bandwagon increases sharply. However, there is a reluctance to lead when leading is a conditional best response. We explain this deviation from the neo-classical equilibrium by injecting some noise in the equilibrium concept. We also find that cheap talk improves efficiency. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们使用Farrell和Saloner(1985)的模型实验性地研究了战略不确定性和互补性对领导者和跟随者行为的影响。该模型的核心是内在的时间安排,不可逆的行动和私人估值。我们发现,战略互补性强烈决定了追随者的行为。一旦受试者决定放弃现状,其他玩家跳入潮流的可能性就会急剧增加。但是,当领导是有条件的最佳回应时,就不愿领导。我们通过在均衡概念中注入一些噪声来解释与新古典均衡的偏离。我们还发现便宜的谈话可以提高效率。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号