首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization >Scapegoating in evaluation decisions
【24h】

Scapegoating in evaluation decisions

机译:克切在评估决策中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Scapegoating & ndash; attributing inordinate blame for a negative outcome to a target individ-ual or group & ndash; is considered an important driver of discrimination by psychologists, but has received little attention by economists. This paper helps fill the gap by providing evi-dence for scapegoating in a natural setting. Using data on three million driving tests held in Israel, I find that an increase in the number of unrelated traffic accident fatalities leads driving testers to discriminate against out-group students. Scapegoating characterizes all groups of testers & ndash; Jewish and Arab, male and female & ndash; and works to increase ethnic in -group bias and decrease gender out-group bias.(c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:克切卢蒂– 归因于目标个人UAL或Group&Ndash的负面结果 被心理学家歧视的重要司机,但经济学家收到了很少的关注。 本文通过提供在自然环境中的克切尔粘合剂来填充差距。 在以色列举行的三百万驾驶测试中使用数据,我发现无关交通事故死亡人数增加导致驾驶测试人员歧视群体学生。 克切尔替补的特征是所有测试人员和ndash; 犹太人和阿拉伯,男性和女性– 并努力增加 - 组群偏见和减少性别外部偏见。(c)2021 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号