...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Earthquake Engineering >A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ACTUAL AND ESTIMATED SEISMIC RESPONSE OF KIRALKIZI DAM IN TURKEY
【24h】

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ACTUAL AND ESTIMATED SEISMIC RESPONSE OF KIRALKIZI DAM IN TURKEY

机译:土耳其基拉尔基兹大坝的实际地震响应与估计地震响应的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Kiralkizi Dam, a 120 m high earthfill dam located in Diyarbakir city, Turkey, was shaken by a moment magnitude, M_w = 4.6 earthquake at an epicentral distance of 8 km, on December 24, 2000, at 13:31 local time. The seismic response of the dam was assessed by using spectral ratios between (ⅰ) available crest and foundation records (C/F), (ⅱ) horizontal and vertical components of the recorded motions (H/V), (ⅲ) by performing 2 dimensional finite difference-based seismic response analyses (Flac-2D), and (ⅳ) 1D elastic shear beam solutions. First mode of vibration of the dam in the transverse direction by all four methods were estimated in the range of 0.55 to 0.62 second. Similar close agreement was not observed in higher modal periods estimated by H/V technique as compared to the predictions by C/F, Flac-2D, shear beam analysis techniques. Thus, H/V technique was concluded to be useful for the estimation of the fundamental resonance frequency of a soil structure, but not for its higher harmonics as consistent with available limited literature. In the longitudinal direction, natural period of the dam was estimated as 0.28 and 0. 82 second by H/V and C/F techniques, respectively. Such disagreement was explained by (ⅰ) differences in the definitions of the estimated periods, (ⅱ) internal impedance contrast of the dam, (ⅲ) contributions of 3D valley effects. Single seismometer record obtained from crest level was found to be inadequate for reliably assessing the response of a dam in the longitudinal direction, and it is recommended to install multiple seismometers both within dambody and the abutments. Last but not least, the results of these analyses were further compared by available accelograms recorded at three earthfill and rockfill dams from Japan. In general, it was concluded that the seismic response of Kiralkizi Dam is comparable and within the prediction ranges of available analyses methods and is consistent with the expected response of a dam this height.
机译:位于土耳其迪亚巴克尔市的120米高的填土坝Kiralkizi大坝在2000年12月24日当地时间13:31在震中8公里处发生了M_w = 4.6级地震。通过使用(ⅰ)可用波峰和地基记录(C / F),(ⅱ)记录的运动的水平和垂直分量(H / V),(ⅲ)之间的频谱比来评估大坝的地震响应,方法是执行2基于尺寸有限差分的地震响应分析(Flac-2D)和(ⅳ)一维弹性剪切梁解决方案。通过所有四种方法,坝体在横向上的第一振动模式估计在0.55至0.62秒的范围内。与通过C / F,Flac-2D,剪切梁分析技术进行的预测相比,在通过H / V技术估计的较高模态期间未观察到类似的紧密一致性。因此,得出结论,H / V技术可用于估算土壤结构的基本共振频率,但不能用于其高次谐波,这与现有有限文献一致。在纵向上,通过H / V和C / F技术估计大坝的自然周期分别为0.28和0. 82秒。通过(was)估算周期定义的差异,(ⅱ)大坝的内部阻抗对比,(ⅲ)3D谷底效应的贡献来解释这种分歧。发现从波峰水平获得的单个地震仪记录不足以可靠地评估大坝在纵向上的响应,因此建议在坝体和桥台内都安装多个地震仪。最后但并非最不重要的一点是,将这些分析的结果与日本三座土石坝和堆石坝上记录的加速度图作了进一步比较。总的来说,得出的结论是,基拉尔基齐大坝的地震响应是可比较的,并且在可用分析方法的预测范围内,并且与该高度的大坝的预期响应一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号