首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Digital Imaging >Contrast Detail Phantom Comparison on a Commercially Available Unit. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) versus Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM)
【24h】

Contrast Detail Phantom Comparison on a Commercially Available Unit. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) versus Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM)

机译:商用单元上的对比细节幻影比较。数字化乳房断层扫描(DBT)与全场数字乳房X线照相术(FFDM)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The performance of a commercial digital mammographic system working in 2D planar versus tomosynthesis mode was evaluated in terms of the image signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR). A contrast detail phantom was obtained embedding 1 cm Plexiglas, including 49 holes of different diameter and depth, between two layers containing a breast-simulating material. The phantom was exposed with the details plane perpendicular to the X-ray beam using the manufacturer’s standard clinical breast acquisition parameters. SDNR in the digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images was higher than that of the full-field digital mammography (FFDM) for 38 out of 49 details in complex background conditions. These differences (p < 0.05) are statistically significant for 19 details out of 38. The relative SDNR results for DBT and FFDM images showed a dependence on the diameter of the details considered. This paper proposes an initial framework for a global image quality evaluation for commercial systems that can operate with different image acquisition modality using the same detector.
机译:根据图像信号差噪比(SDNR)评估了在二维平面与断层合成模式下工作的商业数字乳腺X线摄影系统的性能。获得了一个对比细节体模,该体模在包含乳房模拟材料的两层之间嵌入1 cm Plexiglas,包括49个直径和深度不同的孔。使用制造商的标准临床乳房采集参数,将模型暴露在垂直于X射线束的细节平面上。在复杂背景条件下,数字乳房X线断层合成(DBT)图像中的SDNR在49个细节中有38个高于全场数字乳房X线照片(FFDM)。这些差异(p <0.05)在38个中的19个细节上具有统计学意义。DBT和FFDM图像的相对SDNR结果显示取决于所考虑细节的直径。本文为可使用同一检测器以不同图像采集方式运行的商业系统提出了全球图像质量评估的初始框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号