首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Free-Stall Dimensions: Effects on Preference and Stall Usage
【24h】

Free-Stall Dimensions: Effects on Preference and Stall Usage

机译:自由停转尺寸:对首选项和停转使用的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 2 experiments, free-stall dimensions were examined to determine how they affected stall preference, usage, cleanliness, and milk production in Holstein dairy cattle. In experiment 1, stall width (112 or 132 cm) and stall length (229 and 274 cm from curb to wall) were compared in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of stall treatments using 15 individually housed, non-lactating animals. Cows showed no clear preference for stall size as measured by lying time. When animals had no choice between stalls, average lying time was higher in the wide stalls than in the narrow stalls (10.8 vs. 9.6 +-0.3 h/24 h). Both length and width affected time spent standing with only the front hooves in the stall; total stall area is best explained by the variation associated with this behavior. In experiment 2, 27 lactating dairy cattle were alternately housed with access to stalls of 106, 116, or 126 cm in width using a cross-over design with exposure to each treatment lasting 3 wk. Animals spent an additional 42 min/24 h lying in stalls measuring 126 cm in width compared with stalls with only 106 cm between partitions. Free-stall width influenced the time spent standing with the front 2 hooves in the stall; animals averaged 58 min/24 h in the widest stalls and 85 min/24 h in the narrowest stalls. The amount of time spent standing with all 4 hooves in the stall tended to be longer in wider stalls, and these stalls were also most likely to become soiled with feces. Stall width did not affect the number of lying events or milk production. In conclusion, animals spent more time lying down, and less time was spent standing with only the front hooves in larger stalls, but larger stalls were also more likely to become soiled.
机译:在2个实验中,检查了失速的尺寸,以确定它们如何影响荷斯坦奶牛的失速偏好,用法,清洁度和产奶量。在实验1中,使用15只单独饲养的非泌乳动物,以2 x 2因数布置的失速处理比较了失速宽度(112或132 cm)和失速长度(路缘到墙壁的229和274 cm)。母牛对摊位大小没有明显的偏爱,这是通过躺卧时间来衡量的。当动物在摊位之间别无选择时,宽摊位的平均躺卧时间比狭窄摊位的平均躺卧时间要长(10.8 vs. 9.6 + -0.3 h / 24 h)。长度和宽度都会影响只靠前蹄站立的时间。总失速面积最好用与此行为相关的变化来解释。在实验2中,使用交叉设计交替饲养27头泌乳奶牛,使它们进入宽度为106、116或126 cm的摊位,每次处理持续3周。与隔断之间只有106 cm的摊位相比,动物在宽度为126 cm的摊位上花费了额外的42分钟/ 24小时。自由档的宽度影响了用前两个蹄在档位站立的时间。在最宽的摊位中,动物平均58分钟/ 24小时,在最窄的摊位中平均85分钟/ 24小时。在较宽的摊位中,用所有四个蹄站立的时间往往会更长,而且这些摊位也最有可能被粪便弄脏。失速宽度不影响产卵事件或产奶量。总之,在较大的摊位中,动物花费更多的时间躺下,而仅用前蹄站立的时间更少,但是较大的摊位也更容易被弄脏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号