首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Short Communication: Comparison of Manual Versus Semiautomatic Milk Recording Systems in Dairy Goats
【24h】

Short Communication: Comparison of Manual Versus Semiautomatic Milk Recording Systems in Dairy Goats

机译:简短交流:乳山羊手动对半自动牛奶记录系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A total of 24 Murciano-Granadina dairy goats in early-midlactation were used to compare the labor time and data collection efficiency of using manual (M) vs. semiautomated (SA) systems for milk recording. Goats were milked once daily in a 2 × 12 parallel platform, with 6 milking units on each side. The M system used visual identification (ID) by large plastic ear tags, on-paper data recording, and data manually uploaded to a computer. The SA system used electronic ID, automatic ID, manual data recording on reader keyboard, and automatic data uploading to computer by Bluetooth connection. Data were collected for groups of 2 × 12 goats for 15 test days of each system during a period of 70 d. Time data were converted to a decimal scale. No difference in milk recording time between M and SA (1.32 ± 0.03 and 1.34 ± 0.03 min/goat, respectively) was observed. Time needed for transferring data to the computer was greater for M when compared with SA (0.20 ± 0.01 and 0.05 ± 0.01 min/goat). Overall milk recording time was greater in M than in SA (1.52 ± 0.04 vs. 1.39 ± 0.04 min/goat), the latter decreasing with operator training. Time for transferring milk recording data to the computer was 4.81 ± 0.34 and 1.09 ± 0.10 min for M and SA groups of 24 goats, respectively, but only increased by 0.19 min in SA for each additional 24 goats. No difference in errors of data acquisition was detected between M and SA systems during milk recording (0.6%), but an additional 1.1% error was found in the M system during data uploading. Predicted differences between M and SA increased with the number of goats processed on the test-day. Reduction in labor time cost ranged from (¢)0.5 to 12.9 (US$0.7 to 17.4) per milk recording, according to number of goats from 24 to 480 goats and accounted for 40% of the electronic ID costs. In conclusion, electronic ID was more efficient for labor costs and resulted in fewer data errors, the benefit being greater with trained operators and larger goat herds.
机译:总共有24只早熟的Murciano-Granadina奶山羊用于比较人工(M)系统与半自动(SA)系统进行牛奶记录的劳动时间和数据收集效率。山羊每天在2×12平行平台上挤奶一次,每侧有6个挤奶单元。 M系统使用大型塑料耳标的视觉识别(ID),纸上数据记录以及手动上传到计算机的数据。 SA系统使用电子ID,自动ID,在读取器键盘上手动记录数据以及通过蓝牙连接自动将数据上传到计算机。在70天的时间内,在每个系统的15个测试日内,收集了2×12只山羊的数据。时间数据被转换为十进制刻度。 M和SA之间的牛奶记录时间没有差异(分别为1.32±0.03和1.34±0.03 min /山羊)。与SA相比,M将数据传输到计算机所需的时间更长(0.20±0.01和0.05±0.01分钟/山羊)。 M组的总牛奶记录时间长于SA组(1.52±0.04 vs. 1.39±0.04分钟/山羊),后者随着操作人员的培训而减少。将M组和SA组的24只山羊用于将牛奶记录数据传输到计算机的时间分别为4.81±0.34和1.09±0.10 min,但是每增加24只山羊,在SA中仅增加0.19 min。在牛奶记录期间,M和SA系统之间未检测到数据采集错误的差异(0.6%),但在数据上传期间,M系统中发现了另外的1.1%错误。 M和SA之间的预测差异随测试日处理的山羊数量的增加而增加。根据山羊数量的减少,每头牛奶记录的劳动时间成本降低了(¢)0.5至12.9(0.7美元至17.4美元),从24到480只山羊减少了,占电子ID成本的40%。总之,电子ID可以更有效地降低人工成本,并减少数据错误,受过训练的操作员和更大的山羊群可以带来更大的收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号