首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Effects of Feeding Forage Soybean Silage on Milk Production, Nutrient Digestion, and Ruminal Fermentation of Lactating Dairy Cows
【24h】

Effects of Feeding Forage Soybean Silage on Milk Production, Nutrient Digestion, and Ruminal Fermentation of Lactating Dairy Cows

机译:饲喂饲草大豆青贮饲料对泌乳奶牛产奶,营养消化和瘤胃发酵的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to determine the feeding value of forage soybean silage (SS) for dairy cows relative to a fourth-cut alfalfa silage (AS). Forage soybean was harvested at full pod stage. Two iso-nitroge-nous diets were formulated with a 48:52 forage:concen-trate ratio. Soybean silage and AS constituted 72% of the forage in each diet, with corn silage constituting the remaining 28%. Twenty Holsteins cows in early lactation were used in a switchback design. Four lactating Holsteins cows fitted with ruminal cannulas were used to determine the effects of dietary treatments on ruminal fermentation parameters and in vivo total tract nutrient utilization. Relative to AS, SS contained 15, 28, and 25% more neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and crude protein, respectively. Dry matter intake (23.5 vs. 25.1 kg/d) and milk yield (35.5 vs. 37.2 kg/d) were lower for cows fed SS than for those fed AS. However, energy-corrected milk and milk efficiency were similar for both dietary treatments. Milk protein, lactose, and total solids concentrations were not influenced by dietary treatments (average 3.0, 4.7, and 12.6%, respectively). However, cows fed SS produced milk with greater milk fat (3.8 vs. 3.6%) and milk urea nitrogen concentrations (15.6 vs. 14.3 mg/dL) compared with cows fed AS. Ruminal pH was lower, whereas ruminal NH_3-N concentration was greater in cows fed SS than in cows fed AS. Total tract digestibilities of dry matter, crude protein, and neutral detergent fiber were not influenced by silage type. We concluded that forage SS, when compared with AS, had a negative impact on feed intake and milk yield, whereas energy-corrected milk, milk efficiency, and total tract nutrient digestion were similar.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定相对于第四切苜蓿青贮饲料(AS)而言,奶牛饲用青贮饲料青贮饲料(SS)的饲喂价值。饲用大豆在全荚期收获。以48:52的草料:浓缩比配制两种亚硝酸盐日粮。在每种饲料中,大豆青贮饲料和AS占饲料总量的72%,而玉米青贮饲料占其余28%。在转弯设计中使用了20头处于早期哺乳期的荷斯坦奶牛。使用四只装有瘤胃插管的泌乳荷斯坦奶牛来确定饮食处理对瘤胃发酵参数和体内总道养分利用率的影响。相对于AS,SS分别含有15、28和25%的中性洗涤剂纤维,酸性洗涤剂纤维和粗蛋白。饲喂SS的奶牛的干物质摄入量(23.5 vs. 25.1 kg / d)和产奶量(35.5 vs. 37.2 kg / d)低于饲喂AS的母牛。但是,两种饮食疗法的能量校正牛奶和牛奶效率相似。牛奶蛋白,乳糖和总固形物浓度不受饮食处理的影响(分别为平均3.0、4.7和12.6%)。但是,与饲喂AS的母牛相比,饲喂SS的母牛生产的牛奶具有更高的乳脂(3.8%对3.6%)和牛奶尿素氮浓度(15.6 vs. 14.3 mg / dL)。饲喂SS的母牛的瘤胃pH值较低,而瘤胃的NH_3-N浓度高于饲喂AS的母牛。干物质,粗蛋白和中性洗涤剂纤维的总消化率不受青贮饲料类型的影响。我们得出的结论是,饲草SS与AS相比,对采食量和牛奶产量有负面影响,而能量校正的牛奶,牛奶效率和总养分消化率相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号