首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Effect of different feeding strategies in intensive dairy farming systems on milk fatty acid profiles, and implications on feeding costs in Italy
【24h】

Effect of different feeding strategies in intensive dairy farming systems on milk fatty acid profiles, and implications on feeding costs in Italy

机译:集约化奶牛养殖系统中不同喂养策略对牛奶脂肪酸谱的影响以及对意大利喂养成本的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this work was to characterize the fatty acid (FA) profile of milk from intensive dairy farming systems in the Po Plain (Italy) to estimate the costs of the adopted feeding strategies and to simulate the effect of supplementary premiums on the basis of milk FA composition on milk income. Twenty dairy farms with 5 different feeding strategies were studied: 3 corn silage-based systems in which cows were supplemented with a great proportion (CCH), a medium proportion (CCM), or without commercial concentrate mix (CC0), and 2 systems in which part of corn silage was replaced with grass or legume silage (HF) or with fresh herbage (G), cut and fed indoors. Bulk milk was sampled and lactating cow performance, feeding strategies and forage characteristics were recorded through a survey, 3 times during a year. The milk FA supplementary premium was calculated considering C18:3n-3 and saturated FA (SFA) concentrations, and ratio of total cis C18:l isomers to C16:0. The CCH, CCM, and CC0 systems bought most of their dairy cow feeds off farm, which allowed them to increase milk production to 35,000 L/ yr per hectare. Their low dry matter and crude protein self-sufficiency led to higher feeding costs per liter of milk (from €0.158 to €0.184), and highest income over feed cost was achieved only for milk yield performance greater than 10,000 kg/cow per year. The use of homegrown forages in HF and G increased dry matter and crude protein self-sufficiency and reduced the feeding costs per liter of milk from 9 to 22%, compared with the other studied systems, making HF and G feeding economically competitive, even for a lower milk yield per cow. The studied systems highlighted a remarkable variation in FA profiles. The concentrations of C16:0 and SFA were the highest in CCH (31.53 and 67.84 g/100 g of FA) and G (31.23 and 68.45 g/100 g of FA), because of the larger proportion of commercial concentrate mix in the cow diet. The concentrations of C16:0 and SFA were the lowest in CCM (27.86 and 63.10 g/100 g of FA), because of low roughage-to-concentrate ratio in the cow diet, which is known to favor milk fat depression, affecting particularly these FA. The calculated supplementary premium was the highest in the CCM system, based on milk FA profiles from those herds. The HF diet was rich in forages and resulted in greater concentration of C18:3n-3 in milk (0.57 g/100 g of FA) than the other systems and thus led to an increase in milk FA supplementary premium. Milk from G and HF milk had the lowest ratio of Σn-6:Σn-3 FA compared with milk from the systems based on higher corn silage proportion in the cow diet (3.71, and 3.25, respectively, vs. 4.58 to 4.78), with the lower ratios being closer to recommendation for human nutrition.
机译:这项工作的目的是表征来自意大利波普平原集约化奶牛养殖系统的牛奶的脂肪酸(FA)特性,以估计采用的喂养策略的成本,并在以下基础上模拟补充保费的影响:牛奶FA成分对牛奶收入的影响。研究了20个具有5种不同喂养策略的奶牛场:3个以玉米青贮饲料为基础的系统,其中向母牛补充高比例(CCH),中比例(CCM)或不添加商业浓缩饲料(CC0),以及2个系统将玉米青贮饲料的哪一部分用草或豆类青贮饲料(HF)或新鲜牧草(G)代替,并在室内饲喂。抽样采集大批牛奶,并通过一次调查记录了泌乳牛的生产性能,喂养策略和饲草特征,一年中进行三次。考虑C18:3n-3和饱和FA(SFA)的浓度,以及顺式C18:1异构体与C16:0的总比值,计算出牛奶FA的附加保费。 CCH,CCM和CC0系统从农场购买了大部分奶牛饲料,这使他们能够将牛奶产量提高到每公顷35,000升/年。它们的低干物质和粗蛋白自给自足导致每升牛奶的饲喂成本更高(从0.158欧元增加到0.184欧元),仅当牛奶产量超过10,000千克/牛时,才能实现高于饲料成本的最高收入。与其他研究系统相比,在HF和G中使用自家制的饲草增加了干物质和粗蛋白的自给自足,每升牛奶的饲喂成本从9%降低到22%,这使得HF和G的饲喂在经济上具有竞争力,即使是每头母牛的牛奶产量较低。所研究的系统突出显示了FA轮廓的显着变化。 C16:0和SFA的浓度在CCH(31.53和67.84 g / 100 g FA)和G(31.23和68.45 g / 100 g FA)中最高,这是因为奶牛中商业浓缩混合饲料的比例较高饮食。 C16:0和SFA的浓度在CCM中最低(分别为27.86和63.10 g / 100 g FA),因为奶牛日粮中粗饲料与浓缩物的比例低,众所周知这有利于降低牛奶脂肪含量,特别影响这些FA。根据这些牛群的牛奶FA资料,计算出的补充保费是CCM系统中最高的。 HF日粮富含牧草,导致牛奶中C18:3n-3(0.57 g / 100 g FA)的浓度高于其他系统,从而导致牛奶FA补充溢价的增加。与来自系统的牛奶相比,来自G和HF牛奶的牛奶中Σn-6:Σn-3FA的比例最低,这是基于母牛日粮中玉米青贮比较高的结果(分别为3.71和3.25,相对于4.58至4.78),较低的比例更接近人体营养推荐值。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2013年第11期|6840-6855a1|共17页
  • 作者单位

    University of Turin, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Via L. da Vinci 44, 10095, Grugliasco (Turin), Italy;

    University of Turin, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Via L. da Vinci 44, 10095, Grugliasco (Turin), Italy;

    Associazione Regionale Allevatori del Piemonte, Via Livorno 60,10144, Turin, Italy;

    University of Turin, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Via L. da Vinci 44, 10095, Grugliasco (Turin), Italy;

    Associazione Regionale Allevatori del Piemonte, Via Livorno 60,10144, Turin, Italy;

    INRA, UMR 1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genes-Champanelle, France,Clermont Universite, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France;

    University of Turin, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Via L. da Vinci 44, 10095, Grugliasco (Turin), Italy;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    milk fatty acid; intensive farming system; feeding costs; milk fatty acid supplementary premium;

    机译:牛奶脂肪酸集约化耕作制度;饲养费用;牛奶脂肪酸补充费;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:24:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号