首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Effect of merging levels of locomotion scores for dairy cows on intra- and interrater reliability and agreement
【24h】

Effect of merging levels of locomotion scores for dairy cows on intra- and interrater reliability and agreement

机译:合并奶牛运动评分水平对内和间间信度和一致性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Locomotion scores are used for lameness detection in dairy cows. In research, locomotion scores with 5 levels are used most often. Analysis of scores, however, is done after transformation of the original 5-level scale into a 4-, 3-, or 2-level scale to improve reliability and agreement. The objective of this study was to evaluate different ways of merging levels to optimize resolution, reliability, and agreement of locomotion scores for dairy cows. Locomotion scoring was done by using a 5-level scale and 10 experienced raters in 2 different scoring sessions from videos from 58 cows. Intra- and interrater reliability and agreement were calculated as weighted kappa coefficient (κw) and percentage of agreement (PA), respectively. Overall intra- and interrater reliability and agreement and specific intra- and interrater agreement were determined for the 5-level scale and after transformation into 4-, 3-, and 2-level scales by merging different combinations of adjacent levels. Intra-rater reliability (κw) ranged from 0.63 to 0.86, whereas intrarater agreement (PA) ranged from 60.3 to 82.8% for the 5-level scale. Interrater κw = 0.28 to 0.84 and interrater PA = 22.6 to 81.8% for the 5-level scale. The specific intrarater agreement was 76.4% for locomotion level 1, 68.5% for level 2, 65% for level 3, 77.2% for level 4, and 80% for level 5. Specific interrater agreement was 64.7% for locomotion level 1, 57.5% for level 2, 50.8% for level 3, 60% for level 4, and 45.2% for level 5. Specific intra- and interrater agreement suggested that levels 2 and 3 were more difficult to score consistently compared with other levels in the 5-level scale. The acceptance threshold for overall intra- and interrater reliability (κw and κ ≥0.6) and agreement (PA ≥75%) and specific intra- and interrater agreement (≥75% for all levels within locomotion score) was exceeded only for the 2-level scale when the 5 levels were merged as (12)(345) or (123)(45). In conclusion, when locomotion scoring is performed by experienced raters without further training together, the lowest specific intra- and interrater agreement was obtained in levels 2 and 3 of the 5-level scale. Acceptance thresholds for overall intra- and interrater reliability and agreement and specific intra- and interrater agreement were exceeded only in the 2-level scale.
机译:运动分数用于奶牛的la行检测。在研究中,最常使用5个级别的运动得分。但是,分数分析是在将原始的5级量表转换为4、3或2级量表后进行的,以提高可靠性和一致性。这项研究的目的是评估不同水平的合并方式,以优化分辨率,可靠性和奶牛运动评分的一致性。通过使用5级量表和10位经验丰富的评分员在来自58头奶牛的视频中进行的2次不同评分会议中,对运动评分。内和间的可靠性和一致性分别以加权κ系数(κw)和一致性百分比(PA)计算。通过合并相邻级别的不同组合,确定了5级量表的整体内部和区间可靠性和一致性以及特定的内部和区间一致性,并转换为4、3和2级尺度后。 5级量表的评定者内信度(κw)为0.63至0.86,而评定者内一致性(PA)为60.3至82.8%。 5级量表的Interraterκw= 0.28至0.84,interterrater PA = 22.6至81.8%。运动级别1的特定评分者协议为76.4%,级别2为68.5%,级别3的为65%,级别4为77.2%,级别5的为80%。竞技者级别1的特定的间位者协议为64.7%,为57.5%。第2级,第3级为50.8%,第4级为60%,第5级为45.2%。具体的内部和内部一致意见表明,与第5级的其他级别相比,第2级和第3级的得分更难以统一规模。仅对于2位患者,其总体内和间信度(κw和κ≥0.6)和一致性(PA≥75%)以及特定的内和间信度(运动评分内所有级别的≥75%)的接受阈值均被超过将5个级别合并为(12)(345)或(123)(45)时的级别刻度。总之,当有经验的评分者在没有进一步培训的情况下进行运动评分时,在5级量表的第2级和第3级中获得最低的特定内部和内部一致性。仅在2级量表中才超过了总体内和间信度和一致性以及特定内和间信度的接受阈值。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2014年第9期|5533-5542|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, the Netherlands;

    Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, the Netherlands;

    Farm Technology Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 317, 6700 AH, Wageningen, the Netherlands;

    Division Measure, Model & Manage Bioresponses, KU Leuven, PO Box 2456, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium;

    Division Measure, Model & Manage Bioresponses, KU Leuven, PO Box 2456, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium;

    Division Measure, Model & Manage Bioresponses, KU Leuven, PO Box 2456, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium;

    Institute of Agricultural Engineering-Agricultural Research Organization, PO Box 6, Bet-Dagan 50250, Israel;

    Division Measure, Model & Manage Bioresponses, KU Leuven, PO Box 2456, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium;

    Division Measure, Model & Manage Bioresponses, KU Leuven, PO Box 2456, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium;

    Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, the Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    cattle; lameness; observer; resolution;

    机译:牛行观察者解析度;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号