首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Cow-level associations of lameness, behavior, and milk yield of cows milked in automated systems
【24h】

Cow-level associations of lameness, behavior, and milk yield of cows milked in automated systems

机译:在自动系统中挤奶的母牛的me行,行为和产奶量之间的水平关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study evaluated differences in behavior and productivity between lame and nonlame cows in herds with automated milking systems (AMS). We monitored 30 cows per herd on 41 farms with AMS in Canada (26 herds in Ontario and 15 herds in Alberta). During a 6-d period, milking data (n = 1,184) and lying behavior data (n = 1,209) were collected from cows on 41 farms. Rumination behavior (n = 569) and activity (n = 615) data were available for cows at 22 farms. Locomotion was scored using a numerical rating system (NRS; 1 = sound; 5 = extremely lame). Cows were defined as clinically lame with NRS ≥ 3 (n = 353, 29%) and nonlame with NRS < 3 (n = 865, 71%). Greater parity, lower body condition, and lower environmental temperature were factors associated with lameness. When accounting for other factors, lame cows produced 1.6 kg/d less milk in 0.3 fewer milkings/d. Lame cows were 2.2 times more likely to be fetched more than 1 time during the 6-d period and spent 38 min/d more time lying down in bouts that were 3.5 min longer in comparison with nonlame cows. As the number of cows per AMS unit increased, the frequency of milkings and refusals per cow per day decreased and cow activity increased. For each 13.3-percentage-point increase in freestall stocking density (cows per stall), daily lying time decreased by 13 min/d and cows were 1.6 times more likely to be fetched more than 1 time during the 6-d period. There was no difference in daily rumination or activity between lame and nonlame cows or in night:day rumination time, but lame cows had greater night :day activity ratios. This study supports the growing knowledge that lameness has negative effects on milk production, voluntary milking behavior, and lying behavior of cows in herds with AMS. These results may help dairy producers gain a better appreciation of the negative effects of even moderate cases of lameness and may help motivate them to improve their lameness monitoring and treatment protocols.
机译:这项研究通过自动挤奶系统(AMS)评估了la牛和非lam牛在行为和生产力上的差异。我们在加拿大的41个农场使用AMS监测了每头牛群中的30头母牛(安大略省26头牛群和艾伯塔省15头牛群)。在6天的时间内,从41个农场的奶牛收集了挤奶数据(n = 1,184)和躺卧行为数据(n = 1,209)。有22个农场的母牛的反刍行为(n = 569)和活动(n = 615)数据。使用数字评分系统(NRS; 1 =声音; 5 =非常la脚)对运动进行评分。牛被定义为NRS≥3的临床la足(n = 353,29%)和NRS <3的非lam皮(n = 865,71%)。较高的胎次,较低的身体状况和较低的环境温度是与la行有关的因素。考虑到其他因素,la脚母牛的产奶量将减少1.6公斤/天,挤奶量/日则减少0.3公斤。在6天的时间里,me脚的奶牛被捕获超过1次的可能性是后者的2.2倍,而卧床休息的时间多了38分钟/天,与非lam脚的奶牛相比,躺下的时间长3.5分钟。随着每AMS单位母牛数量的增加,每天每头母牛挤奶和拒绝的次数减少,母牛活动增加。速冻牲畜密度(每摊位的母牛)每增加13.3个百分点,每天的躺卧时间就会减少13分钟/天,而在6天的时间内,母牛被捕捞超过1次的可能性是母牛的1.6倍。 la脚母牛和非lam脚母牛之间的每日反刍或活动没有差异,或者在夜间:白天反刍时间上没有差异,但是la脚母牛的夜间:白天活动比例更高。这项研究支持越来越多的认识,即la行会对AMS牛群中的产奶量,自愿挤奶行为和奶牛躺卧行为产生负面影响。这些结果可能有助于乳制品生产商更好地认识甚至是中度cases行病例的负面影响,并可能有助于激励他们改善其la行监测和治疗方案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2017年第6期|4818-4828|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada;

    Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada;

    Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada;

    Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    robotic milking; behavior; lameness; management;

    机译:机器人挤奶;行为;行管理;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号