首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Animal Behavior and Well-Being
【24h】

Animal Behavior and Well-Being

机译:动物行为和幸福

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A goal of dairy cattle management is to meet the nutritional requirementsof individuals, but there is large variability in behavior and performanceof cows. The objective of this study was to identify and associate personalitytraits with behavior and performance of cows milked in a free-trafficautomated milking system (AMS) and determine if the response to concentrateallocation in an AMS is associated with those personality traits.Holstein cows (n = 15; 124 ± 53 DIM; parity = 2.7 ± 0.9) were exposed to2 treatments in a crossover design with 2 consecutive 28-d periods: cowswere provided a basal PMR with a pelleted AMS concentrate allowanceof: 1) 3.0 kg/d (L-AMS) or 2) 6.0 kg/d (H-AMS). During the last 5 d ofthe first period, behaviors in response to a novel arena, object and humanwere scored to identify personality traits. Principal component analysisrevealed 5 factors interpreted as personality traits (2 from novel humantest = 72% cumulative variance; 3 from novel object and novel arena tests= 81% cumulative variance). Linear regressions were used to explore relationshipsbetween each factor and behavior and performance outcomes.Cows high on Factor 1 (active and vocal) had greater total DMI, sortingof the PMR, and lying bouts, but shorter lying bout duration (P < 0.01).Cows high on Factor 2 (fearful of human) had greater meal size (P =0.05), gained BW (P = 0.04), and required more AMS fetches (P < 0.01),likely explaining their lesser concentrate intake and milk yield (P < 0.01).These cows were less likely to meet their target concentrate allowance onthe H-AMS treatment (P < 0.01). Cows high on Factor 3 (active) gainedBW (P = 0.05) and had more problematic milkings (P < 0.01), likely explainingtheir lesser milk yield (P = 0.02). Cows high on Factor 4 (social)had greater meal frequency and SCC (P < 0.01) and lesser % milk fat (P= 0.03) and protein (P = 0.04). Cows high on Factor 5 (fearful of object)had greater eating rate (P = 0.02), rumination (P = 0.03), and % milkprotein (P = 0.01). These results indicate that personality traits of dairycattle are associated with feeding behavior and performance in an AMS.
机译:乳制力养牛管理的目标是满足营养需求个人,但行为和性能有很大的变化奶牛。本研究的目的是识别和助理人格在自由交通中挤奶的行为和性能的特质自动挤奶系统(AMS),并确定是否响应集中AMS中的分配与那些人格特征有关。荷斯坦奶牛(n = 15; 124±53昏暗;平均奇地= 2.7±0.9)接触到2个交叉设计的治疗,连续28℃:奶牛提供了一个基础PMR,颗粒浓缩乳液占用余量:1)3.0 kg / d(l-ams)或2)6.0kg / d(H-ams)。在过去的5 d中第一期,行为是响应小说竞技场,对象和人类的得分以识别人格特质。主要成分分析揭示了5种因素被解释为个性特征(来自新的人类测试= 72%累积方差; 3从新的对象和新颖的竞技场测试= 81%的累积方差)。线性回归用于探索关系在每个因素和行为和性能结果之间。因子1(活跃和声带)高的奶牛总共DMI,排序PMR和撒谎的谎言,但较短的躺着持续时间(P <0.01)。奶牛高因素2(害怕人类)有更大的膳食大小(P =0.05),获得BW(p = 0.04),并要求更多的AMS提取(P <0.01),可能解释其较小的浓缩物摄入和牛奶率(P <0.01)。这些奶牛不太可能符合他们的目标集中津贴H-AMS治疗(P <0.01)。奶牛高于因子3(活跃)获得BW(P = 0.05)并具有更有问题的挤奶(P <0.01),可能是解释牛奶产量较小(p = 0.02)。奶牛高因素4(社会)有更大的膳食频率和SCC(P <0.01)和较小的乳脂(P= 0.03)和蛋白质(p = 0.04)。奶牛高因素5(害怕对象)饮食率较大(p = 0.02),谣言(p = 0.03)和%牛奶蛋白质(p = 0.01)。这些结果表明乳制品的人格特征牛与AMS的喂养行为和表现相关联。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2020年第suppla期|112-113|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号