首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Effects of commercially available palmitic and stearic acid supplements on nutrient digestibility and production responses of lactating dairy cows
【24h】

Effects of commercially available palmitic and stearic acid supplements on nutrient digestibility and production responses of lactating dairy cows

机译:市售棕榈和硬脂酸补充剂对哺乳酸奶牛养分消化率和生产响应的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We evaluated the effects of commercially availablefatty acid (FA) supplements containing palmitic (C16:0)and stearic acid (C18:0) on nutrient digestibility andproduction responses of dairy cows. Thirty-six midlactation(146 ± 55 d in milk) multiparous Holsteincows were randomly assigned to twelve 3 × 3 balancedtruncated Latin squares, with 3 treatments and 2 consecutive35-d periods, with the final 5 d used for sampleand data collection. Treatments were (1) a control dietcontaining no supplemental FA (CON), (2) a controldiet supplemented with a commercially available C16:0supplement (PA), and (3) a control diet supplementedwith a commercially available C16:0 and C18:0 supplement(MIX). Supplements were fed at 1.5% dry matterand replaced soyhulls in CON. The statistical modelincluded the random effect of cow nested within squareand the fixed effects of treatment, period, square, andtheir interactions. Preplanned contrasts were (1) overalleffect of FA treatments [CON vs. the average ofthe FA treatments (FAT); 1/2 (PA + MIX)], and (2)effect of FA supplement (PA vs. MIX). Treatment hadno effects on dry matter intake, body weight, or bodyweight change. Compared with CON, FAT decreaseddigestibilities of total FA and 18-carbon FA but did notaffect dry matter and neutral detergent fiber digestibility.Compared with MIX, PA increased dry matterand neutral detergent fiber digestibilities by 3.6 and 4.8percentage units, respectively. The PA also increasedtotal FA and 18-carbon FA digestibilities but did notalter 16-carbon FA digestibility compared with MIX.Using a Lucas test, we estimated apparent digestibilitycoefficients of 0.768 and 0.553 for the PA and MIXsupplements, respectively. Compared with CON, FATincreased milk yield and tended to increase energy-correctedmilk, but did not affect yield of milk fat or milkprotein. The PA increased energy-corrected milk andmilk fat yield but had no effect on milk protein yieldcompared with MIX. Our results indicate that dairycows producing around 45 kg of milk respond betterto a FA supplement enriched in C16:0 compared witha supplement containing both C16:0 and C18:0, whichis likely due in part to PA increasing FA and neutraldetergent fiber digestibility compared with MIX.
机译:我们评估了商业上可用的影响含有棕榈酸的脂肪酸(FA)补充剂(C16:0)和硬脂酸(C18:0)营养消化率和奶牛的生产响应。三十六个中疗(牛奶中146±55 d)多重荷斯坦奶牛随机分配到12个3×3平衡截断的拉丁方块,3种治疗和连续2个35-D时期,最后5 d用于样品和数据收集。治疗是(1)对照饮食不含补充FA(CON),(2)控制饮食补充有市售C16:0补充(PA)和(3)补充控制饮食使用市售C16:0和C18:0补充(混合)。补充剂加入1.5%干物质并在骗局中取代了大豆。统计模型包括牛在广场内嵌套的随机效应以及治疗,时期,广场和和他们的互动。预先预分的对比度是(1)总体FA治疗的效果[符合平均值FA治疗(脂肪); 1/2(PA + MIX)]和(2)FA补充的影响(PA对阵混合)。治疗有没有对干物质摄入,体重或身体的影响重量变化。与孔相比,脂肪减少总FA和18碳FA的消化率,但没有影响干物质和中性洗涤剂纤维消化率。与混合物相比,PA增加干物质和中性洗涤剂纤维消化率3.6和4.8百分比单位分别为单位。 PA也增加了总成本和18碳的FA消化量,但没有与混合物相比,改变16碳的FA消化率。使用Lucas测试,我们估计了表观消化率PA和混合系数为0.768和0.553补充剂分别。与腐蚀相比,脂肪增加牛奶产量并倾向于增加能量纠正牛奶,但没有影响牛奶脂肪或牛奶的产量蛋白质。 PA增加了能量矫正牛奶和牛奶脂肪产量但对牛奶蛋白质产量没有影响与混合相比。我们的结果表明乳制品生产大约45公斤的牛奶的奶牛更好与C16中的FA补充剂相比包含C16:0和C18:0的补充剂,哪个很可能是部分归因于PA增加的FA和中性与混合物相比的洗涤剂纤维消化率。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2020年第6期|5131-5142|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Animal Science Michigan State University East Lansing 48824;

    Department of Animal Science Michigan State University East Lansing 48824;

    Department of Animal Science Michigan State University East Lansing 48824;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    palmitic acid; stearic acid; digestibility; fat supplementation;

    机译:棕榈酸;硬脂酸;消化率;脂肪补充;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 22:29:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号