...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Curriculum Studies >History at the mercy of politicians and ideologies: Germany, England, and the Netherlands in the 19th and 20th centuries
【24h】

History at the mercy of politicians and ideologies: Germany, England, and the Netherlands in the 19th and 20th centuries

机译:历史受政治家和意识形态的支配:19世纪和20世纪的德国,英国和荷兰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The paper analyses and compares developments in history teaching in Germany, England, and the Netherlands in the 19th and 20th centuries. The development of history teaching in the three countries shows striking similarities. National politics have always used history education for purposes which did not necessarily tally with distanced critical thinking, carefully balanced judgements, and a striving for unbiased interpretations. In the two centuries described here, only the decades of the 1960s and 1970s have been different. Then politics and society scorned a subject which was so clearly unfit for a ‘modern age’. Attempts were made to eliminate history from the school curriculum. As a consequence, history educators adopted a defensive position and a new type of history teaching emerged, which put critical and distanced thinking at the centre. Because politics had turned its back on history, it was possible to develop a vision of history teaching which did not serve any preconceived political aim but took historical thinking as such as its point of departure. During the 1980s and 1990s, the old recipe of forging nations was revived and traditional curricula were once more brought to life.View full textDownload full textKeywordscitizenship, educational history, history instruction, national curriculum, national standardsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220270903049446
机译:本文分析并比较了19世纪和20世纪德国,英国和荷兰的历史教学发展。两国历史教学的发展有着惊人的相似之处。国家政治一直将历史教育用于一些目的,这些目的不一定与遥远的批判性思维,审慎的平衡判断以及对无偏见的解释的努力相吻合。在这里描述的两个世纪中,只有1960年代和1970年代的十年有所不同。然后,政治和社会嘲笑了一个显然不适合“现代时代”的主题。试图消除学校课程中的历史记录。结果,历史教育者采取了防御性的立场,出现了一种新型的历史教学方法,这种方法以批判性的和遥远的思想为中心。由于政治已经放弃了历史,因此有可能发展出一种历史教学的视野,这种视野没有任何先入之见的政治目的,而是以历史思维为出发点。在1980年代和1990年代,锻造国家的旧配方得以复兴,传统课程又重新焕发了生命。查看全文下载全文关键字公民身份,教育历史,历史教学,国家课程,国家标准相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒&弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220270903049446

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号