首页> 外文期刊>Journal for Cultural Research >Post‐Millennial Feminist Theory: Encounters with Humanism, Materialism, Critique, Nature, Biology and Darwin
【24h】

Post‐Millennial Feminist Theory: Encounters with Humanism, Materialism, Critique, Nature, Biology and Darwin

机译:后千年女性主义理论:与人本主义,唯物主义,批判,自然,生物学和达尔文的En

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article reflects on the emergence of a strikingly affirmative form of feminist theorising, despite widespread discussion of the early twenty‐first century being a post‐feminist era. The author begins by sketching the general features of this new orientation, contrasting it with second‐wave feminist theorising and identifying a cluster of feminist theorists who, despite their different concerns and distinctive work, can be seen as affiliated in this reorientation in feminist theory. The second section offers a discussion of three key terms in post‐millennial feminist theory: post‐humanism, new materialism and the ontological turn. This section explores their deployment and significance in identifying new directions in feminist theory. In the third section, the author introduces a specific case study of this post‐millennial reorientation of feminist theory: Elizabeth Grosz's advocacy of Darwin's ideas is proposed as exemplifying this new trend in feminist theory. There is a brief review of Grosz's writings on Darwin and three key points in Grosz's encounter with Darwinian theory are highlighted. These important features of Grosz's approach to Darwin's ideas are then reviewed: the rejection of critique, the revisiting of the nature-culture divide and the embrace of biology. The discussion of each of these foci includes consideration of the rationale for and strengths of Grosz's positions. However, this commentary also highlights some worrying lacunae in her theories.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14797581003765382
机译:尽管对二十世纪初(后世纪)是后女性主义时代进行了广泛讨论,但本文仍在反思一种惊人肯定的女性主义理论形式的出现。作者首先概述了这种新取向的一般特征,将其与第二波女权主义理论进行对比,并确定了一群女权理论家,尽管他们的关注点和工作不同,但可以被视为与女权理论的这种新取向有关。 。第二部分讨论了后千年女性主义理论中的三个关键术语:后人道主义,新唯物主义和本体论转向。本节探讨了它们在确定女权主义理论新方向方面的应用和意义。在第三部分中,作者介绍了这一对女性主义理论在千禧年后重新定位的具体案例研究:提出伊丽莎白·格罗斯(Elizabeth Grosz)对达尔文思想的拥护,以例证女性主义理论的这一新趋势。格罗斯(Grosz)关于达尔文(Darwin)的著作作了简要回顾,并着重强调了格罗斯(Grosz)与达尔文理论的交锋中的三个关键点。格罗斯(Grosz)处理达尔文(Darwin)观念的方法的这些重要特征随后进行了回顾:批判的拒绝,对自然文化鸿沟的重新审视以及对生物学的拥护。对这些焦点的讨论都包括对格罗兹职位立场的理由和优势的考虑。但是,此评论也突显了她理论中的一些令人担忧的缺陷。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon, digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14797581003765382

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号