首页> 外文期刊>The journal of criminal law >Control Order Hearings: Compliance With Article 6 Echr
【24h】

Control Order Hearings: Compliance With Article 6 Echr

机译:控制令听证会:遵守Echr第6条

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AF, AM, AN and AE were subject to non-derogating control orders pursuant to s. 2(1) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005. Control orders are preventative orders that require specified individuals to comply with obligations imposed for purposes connected with protecting members of the public from a risk of terrorism. Under s. 2 (1), the Home Secretary has the power to impose a non-derogating control order where she has reasonable grounds for suspecting that an individual is or has been involved in terrorism-related activity and where she considers it necessary, for purposes connected with protecting members of the public from a risk of terrorism, to make a control order imposing obligations on an individual. The High Court will determine whether the concept of reasonable suspicion is satisfied in a hearing pursuant to s. 3(10) of the 2005 Act.
机译:AF,AM,AN和AE受s条约束。 《 2005年防止恐怖主义法》第2(1)条。控制令是预防性命令,要求特定个人遵守为保护公众免受恐怖主义风险而执行的义务。在s下。根据第2(1)条,如果内政大臣有合理的理由怀疑某人正在或曾经参与与恐怖主义有关的活动,并且她认为有必要(出于与之相关的目的),则内政大臣有权施加不克减的控制令。保护公众免受恐怖主义的威胁,作出控制令,对个人施加义务。高等法院将根据s的规定,在听证会中确定是否满足合理怀疑的概念。 《 2005年法令》第3(10)条。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号