首页> 外文期刊>The journal of criminal law >Privatising Criminal Justice? Shopping in the Netherlands
【24h】

Privatising Criminal Justice? Shopping in the Netherlands

机译:私有化刑事司法?在荷兰购物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Netherlands is encouraging Public Private Partnerships (PPP) for reducing problems of crime and anti-social behaviour. This article reports research done by the author on the Collective Shop Ban, allegedly the most successful form of Public Private Partnerships currently operating in the Netherlands. With the Collective Shop Ban, shopkeepers have their own measure to keep individuals who exhibit anti-social behaviour from entering their shops. In this way private parties, i.e. shopkeepers and security personnel, are co-responsible for detecting and punishing classic punishable acts such as shoplifting and fraud. The Collective Shop Ban is an interesting measure to study, all the more because it is no longer based primarily on criminal law, but on civil law. It is interesting to see to what extent the Collective Shop Ban differs from the Dutch criminal law approach, what this civil law approach means for the perpetrator, and what are the legal and societal consequences.
机译:荷兰正在鼓励公私伙伴关系(PPP)减少犯罪和反社会行为的问题。本文报道了作者在“集体商店禁令”上所做的研究,集体禁令据称是荷兰目前最成功的公私合营形式。通过“集体商店禁令”,店主有自己的措施来阻止表现出反社会行为的个人进入他们的商店。这样,私人当事方,即店主和安全人员,共同负责侦查和惩罚诸如入店行窃和欺诈之类的经典应受惩罚的行为。集体商店禁令是一种有趣的学习方法,因为它不再主要基于刑法,而是基于民法。有趣的是,《集体商店禁令》与荷兰的刑法方法有多大不同;这种民法方法对犯罪者意味着什么;以及法律和社会后果是什么?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号