首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Contemporary Religion >Including Religion: Reflections on Legal, Religious, and Social Implications of the Developing Ceremonial Law of Marriage and Civil Partnership
【24h】

Including Religion: Reflections on Legal, Religious, and Social Implications of the Developing Ceremonial Law of Marriage and Civil Partnership

机译:包括宗教:对发展中的婚姻与民事伙伴关系礼仪法的法律,宗教和社会含义的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The introduction in the UK of the Civil Partnership Act (2004) and it's enactment (2005) seemed to herald a new plurality and inclusiveness in the ceremonial law and practices of marriage. However, the provisions of the Act maintain an historically exclusive demarcation between secular and religious elements. Neither the ceremony nor the approved premises may have any relation to religious content or usage. Consequently, three groups remain unable to participate in religious weddings: same-sex couples, members of small religious communities, and dissidents. The public act of a wedding for these groups is not only exclusive, we argue, but pays little heed to the private needs of participants nor the private ritual significance such acts necessarily include. Moreover, the exclusion of religious elements is both difficult to interpret and police. We examine the nature and limitations of the provisions and guidance on the Civil Partnership Act and argue that maintenance of a standardised secularism within public law, as in marriage law and the Civil Partnership Act, is anachronous in a modern plural state. This article challenges the division between public secular acts and private acts of ritual and personal significance. We suggest that private actors import religious elements and meanings into secular ceremonies and that guidance to registrars officiating in civil ceremonies does not provide absolute prohibitions to couples using religiously significant elements of ritual or practice. We conclude that the Act continues practices of unjustified differential treatment and that reform to a more inclusive legal framework is both possible and necessary.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2011.539838
机译:英国引入《民事伴侣关系法》(2004年)及其法规(2005年)似乎预示着仪式法和婚姻惯例的新的多元化和包容性。但是,该法的规定在历史上一直是世俗和宗教之间的界限。仪式或批准的场所均不得与宗教内容或用途有任何关系。因此,三个团体仍然无法参加宗教婚礼:同性伴侣,小型宗教团体的成员和持不同政见者。我们认为,针对这些团体的婚礼的公开行为不仅是排他性的,而且很少关注参与者的私人需求,也没有注意到此类行为必定包含的私人仪式意义。此外,排斥宗教元素既难以解释,也很难被警察使用。我们研究了《民事合伙法》条款和指南的性质和局限性,并指出,在现代的多元化国家中,维持公法中的标准化世俗主义(如婚姻法和《民事合伙法》)是不合时宜的。本文对具有仪式和个人意义的公共世俗行为与私人行为之间的区分提出了挑战。我们建议,私人演员将宗教元素和含义导入世俗仪式中,并且指导主持民事仪式的注册服务商不应绝对禁止夫妇使用具有宗教意义的仪式或习俗元素。我们的结论是,该法案继续实行不公正的差别待遇做法,并且有可能而且有必要改革为更具包容性的法律框架。查看全文下载全文相关的变量add add_id = ,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2011.539838

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号