首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Contaminant Hydrology >Comparison of supercritical fluid extraction(SFE), soxhlet and shaking methods for pendimethalin, extraction from soils: effect of soil properties and water content
【24h】

Comparison of supercritical fluid extraction(SFE), soxhlet and shaking methods for pendimethalin, extraction from soils: effect of soil properties and water content

机译:从土壤中萃取超临界流体萃取(SFE),索氏萃取法和摇匀法对二甲戊乐灵的比较:土壤性质和水分含量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Supercritical fluid extraction with CO_2 was applied to the analysis of traces of pendimethalin, a herbicide of the dinitroanilines group, in four different natural soils. The Supercritical Fluid Extraction(SFE)method was compared with the classical Soxhlet and shaking methods in terms Of ease to run, extraction efficiency, selectivity and reproducibility. The influence of the Physico-chemical properties of the soil matrix on herbicide extraction was then evaluated with the SFE method. The supercritical fluid extraction system used in the present study was found to be Much easier to run than the other two methods, less time consuming and requires fewer operations As it was optimized for on-line sample clean up.
机译:应用CO_2超临界流体萃取技术分析了四种不同天然土壤中二硝基苯胺类除草剂二甲戊乐灵的含量。在操作简便,提取效率,选择性和重现性方面,将超临界流体萃取(SFE)方法与经典的索氏萃取法和摇匀法进行了比较。然后用SFE方法评估了土壤基质的理化性质对除草剂提取的影响。发现本研究中使用的超临界流体萃取系统比其他两种方法更容易运行,耗时更少,所需操作更少,因为它已针对在线样品净化进行了优化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号