...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Consumer Marketing >To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying
【24h】

To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying

机译:买还是不买?绿色购买的社会困境视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to draw on social dilemma theory and reference group theory to explain the attitude-behavior inconsistency inrnenvironmental consumerism. This research seeks to better understand why, despite concern towards the environment (attitude), consumers fail tornpurchase environmentally friendly or green products (behavior).rnDesign/methodology/approach - A survey instrument was developed that used scales to measure eight independent and one dependent variable.rnIn addition, socio-demographic data were also collected about the study participants. To discriminate between green and non-green buyers,rnclassification with discriminant analysis was used.rnFindings - The framework presented contributes to the environmental consumerism literature by framing the attitude-behavior gap as a socialrndilemma and draws on reference group theory to identify individual factors to help understand the gap and suggest ways in which to bridge it. Resultsrnfrom the study reveal that several characteristics of the individual - trust, in-group identity, expectation of others' cooperation and perceived efficacy -rnwere significant in differentiating between "non-green" and "green" buyers.rnPractical implications - The results of the study offer several managerial implications. First, marketers should reinforce the role trust plays inrnsolidifying collective action. Second, because of the strong influence of reference groups in green buying, marketing communications managers shouldrnuse spokespeople who are relatable. Third, the study showed that expectation of others' cooperation significantly identifies green buyers. Fourth, tornaddress the perception of personal efficacy, it is important that green marketers emphasize the difference that individual action makes for the collectiverngood.rnOriginality/value - The research draws on both social dilemma and reference group theories to investigate the determinants of and the mechanismsrnto explain the rationale behind the attitude-behavior gap as it pertains to a specific environmental issue - energy conservation.
机译:目的-本文的目的是利用社会困境理论和参考群体理论来解释环境消费主义中的态度-行为不一致。这项研究旨在更好地理解为什么尽管关注环境(态度),但消费者仍未购买环保或绿色产品(行为).rn设计/方法/方法-开发了一种调查工具,该工具使用标尺来测量八个独立的和一个独立的此外,还收集了有关研究参与者的社会人口统计学数据。为了区分绿色购买者和非绿色购买者,使用了带有判别分析的分类方法。rn研究结果-提出的框架通过将态度-行为鸿沟定为一种社会困境,为环境消费主义文学做出了贡献,并借鉴了参考群体理论来识别个体因素以帮助了解差距并提出弥合差距的方法。研究结果表明,个人的几个特征-信任,团体内认同,对他人合作的期望以及感知的效力-在区分“非绿色”和“绿色”购买者方面具有重要意义。研究提供了一些管理上的启示。首先,营销人员应加强信任在巩固集体行动中的作用。其次,由于参考群体在绿色采购中的强大影响力,营销传播经理应该聘请与之相关的发言人。第三,研究表明,对他人合作的期望大大地确定了绿色买家。第四,撕裂个人效能感,绿色营销者必须强调个人行为对集体利益的影响。原始性/价值-该研究借鉴了社会困境和参考群体理论来研究决定因素和解释机制与特定环境问题有关的态度-行为差距背后的原理-节能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号