...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Consumer Marketing >Comparing two mechanisms for green consumption: cognitive-affect behavior vs theory of reasoned action
【24h】

Comparing two mechanisms for green consumption: cognitive-affect behavior vs theory of reasoned action

机译:比较绿色消费的两种机制:认知影响行为和理性行为理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of the cognitive-affect behavior (CAB) model and the theory of reasoned action (TRA) model as well as their extended forms (with product knowledge) in predicting everyday green consumption among non-Hispanic White and Hispanic consumers. Design/methodology/approach: Survey data from a convenience sample of 249 non-Hispanic Whites and 425 Hispanic adults were used to test the two models through structural equation modeling analyses. Findings: While all tested models explained green consumption in both samples adequately, the basic TRA and the TPB (extended TRA) models were superior to the basic and extended CAB models. Including product knowledge further enhanced the predictive power of the two basic models. Research limitations/implications: Self-reported surveys are subject to social desirability bias in the reporting of intentions and actual purchases of green products. Future research may attempt to collect data on actual green purchases. The selection of a general consumption context is limited in distinguishing between high- and low-involvement products. Future research should test the relative effectiveness of these models among specific green products with different levels of involvement. Practical implications: Marketing and strategic communication programs should focus on increasing consumers’ positive attitudes about purchasing green products and promote green purchase intentions using intention-generating promotional tactics. This paper also stresses the need to increase consumers’ concrete knowledge about green products to drive actual purchase behavior. Social implications: This paper can help communicators to further promote green consumption for routinely purchased consumer goods, which will ultimately enhance a healthier and more sustainable environment. Originality/value: This paper extends the literature about green consumption, providing insights about the relative effectiveness of two widely accepted consumer behavior models. It implies that some models excel over others in terms of their explanatory power across consumer populations regardless of socio-demographic differences. It also stresses the importance of specifying explicitly behavioral control variables in green consumption research and provides a viable basis for the development of strategic marketing.
机译:目的:本文的目的是比较认知影响行为(CAB)模型和理性行为理论(TRA)模型及其扩展形式(带有产品知识)在预测非居民日常绿色消费中的有效性。 -西班牙裔西班牙裔和西班牙裔消费者。设计/方法/方法:使用来自249名非西班牙裔白人和425名西班牙裔成年人的便利样本的调查数据,通过结构方程模型分析来测试这两种模型。结果:尽管所有测试的模型都充分说明了两个样品的绿色消耗,但是基本TRA和TPB(扩展TRA)模型优于基本和扩展CAB模型。包括产品知识进一步增强了两个基本模型的预测能力。研究的局限性/意义:自我报告的调查在报告绿色产品的意图和实际购买时受到社会期望偏差的影响。未来的研究可能会尝试收集有关实际绿色采购的数据。在区分高消费和低消费产品时,一般消费环境的选择受到限制。未来的研究应在不同参与程度的特定绿色产品中测试这些模型的相对有效性。实际意义:市场营销和战略传播计划应着重于提高消费者对购买绿色产品的积极态度,并使用产生意图的促销策略来促进绿色购买意图。本文还强调需要增加消费者对绿色产品的具体了解,以推动实际的购买行为。社会影响:本文可以帮助传播者进一步促进日常购买的消费品的绿色消费,这最终将改善健康和更可持续的环境。原创性/价值:本文扩展了有关绿色消费的文献,提供了关于两个被广泛接受的消费者行为模型的相对有效性的见解。这意味着,无论社会人口统计学差异如何,某些模型在消费者群体中的解释力都优于其他模型。它还强调了在绿色消费研究中明确规定行为控制变量的重要性,并为发展战略营销提供了可行的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号