首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Construction Engineering and Management >Empirical Comparison of Design/Build and Design/Bid/Build Project Delivery Methods
【24h】

Empirical Comparison of Design/Build and Design/Bid/Build Project Delivery Methods

机译:设计/建造与设计/投标/建造项目交付方法的经验比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compares the performance of design/bid/build and design/build to see if one project delivery method is superior in regards to time and cost. Similar military buildings were used to identify two samples of projects delivered with each of the two delivery methods. These projects provide a meaningful comparison because they include buildings of the same typology (i.e., U.S. Navy Bachelor Enlisted Quarters) delivered using similar design models. Project duration, project duration per bed, project time growth, cost growth and cost per bed were statistically compared. Upon completion of the analysis, the hypothesis that design/build projects are superior to design/bid/build projects in regards to time and cost was tested. Design/build projects were proven superior in performance in almost every measure. Other findings, including recommendations to practitioners and researchers, will be provided as well.
机译:这项研究比较了设计/投标/构建和设计/构建的性能,以查看一种项目交付方法在时间和成本方面是否优越。类似的军事建筑被用来识别两种交付方式所交付的两个项目样本。这些项目提供了有意义的比较,因为它们包括使用类似设计模型交付的具有相同类型(即美国海军学士入伍宿舍)的建筑物。对项目工期,每张床的工期,项目时间增长,成本增长和每张床成本进行了统计比较。分析完成后,就时间/成本方面,设计/建造项目优于设计/投标/建造项目的假设进行了检验。实践证明,设计/建造项目几乎在所有方面均具有出色的性能。还将提供其他发现,包括对从业人员和研究人员的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号