...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Construction Engineering and Management >Owners Respond: Preferences for Task Performance, Delivery Systems, and Quality Management
【24h】

Owners Respond: Preferences for Task Performance, Delivery Systems, and Quality Management

机译:业主回应:任务绩效,交付系统和质量管理的偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Twenty years ago, public owners did almost all of their own design work and project inspection, but this is no longer the case. Innovative construction ideas of 15 years ago are now considered mainstream, and newer ideas are taking their places. Fifteen years ago, the concept of fast-track construction was still being researched and many federal agencies refused to fund it; today, most large federal projects call for some sort of fast tracking. These systems allow construction input into the design process of construction projects. Whoever performs tasks such as scope development, prebid cost estimates, and quality assurance can significantly affect the quality of the project, as can which delivery system is used. The Construction Institute of ASCE sponsored a survey of construction owners to determine what delivery systems are used in their projects and whom they select to perform various tasks. The survey also sought to ascertain the owners' satisfaction level with the performance of the individuals and systems they choose. This paper, written for practitioners and researchers, describes the results of that survey.
机译:二十年前,公共业主几乎完成了所有自己的设计工作和项目检查,但现在情况已不再如此。 15年前的创新建筑理念现在被认为是主流,而新的理念正在取代它们。 15年前,仍在研究快速通道建设的概念,许多联邦机构拒绝为其提供资金。今天,大多数大型联邦项目都要求某种快速跟踪。这些系统允许将建设投入到建设项目的设计过程中。谁执行诸如范围开发,前期成本估算和质量保证之类的任务,就可以严重影响项目的质量,而使用哪种交付系统也是如此。 ASCE建设学院发起了一项对建筑业主的调查,以确定他们的项目中使用了哪种交付系统以及他们选择谁来执行各种任务。该调查还试图确定所有者对他们选择的个人和系统的性能的满意程度。这份为从业者和研究人员撰写的论文描述了该调查的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号