首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Construction Engineering and Management >Current Applications of Game Theory in Construction Engineering and Management Research: A Social Network Analysis Approach
【24h】

Current Applications of Game Theory in Construction Engineering and Management Research: A Social Network Analysis Approach

机译:博弈论在建设工程与管理研究中的应用:社会网络分析方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Game theory provides a rigorous mathematical approach to evaluate and predict stakeholders' interactions. Even though the construction industry is rich with encounters among its stakeholders, construction engineering and management (CEM) research lacks a thorough investigation of game-theoretic applications. This paper presents an overview of the current game-theoretic models in CEM research, aiming to enhance the understanding of the applications of game theory in analyzing CEM strategic interactions within multiple application domains and project delivery systems (PDSs). The authors analyzed 87 CEM peer-reviewed publications employing gametheoretic models between 1998 and 2019. The analysis accounted for CEM application domain, involvement of stakeholders, PDS addressed, and type of game theoretic solution used in each publication. The authors performed a Social Network Analysis (SNA) of the current gametheoretic interactions, identifying literature trends and gaps to be addressed in future research. Unlike traditional literature review methods, SNA provides a quantitative approach in analyzing the existing body of knowledge. Research findings demonstrate the contributions of game theory in seven CEM applications (conflict resolution; bargaining and negotiations; allocation of cooperative benefits; governance and supervision; evolution of cooperation and trust; construction bidding; and risk allocation). Through SNA, the highest degree centrality levels were found in Owner-Contractor games in the context of CEM bidding, conflict resolution, as well as bargaining and negotiations. SNA also revealed the need for further investigation of interactions among CEM stakeholders within PDS other than the traditional Design-Bid-Build and Public-Private-Partnerships. Moreover, games featuring strategic alliances and supply chains of multiagents can provide more adequate reflections of actual interactions. (C) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
机译:博弈论提供了一种严格的数学方法来评估和预测利益相关者的互动。尽管建筑业在其利益相关者中遭遇丰富,但建筑工程和管理(CEM)研究缺乏对游戏理论应用的彻底调查。本文概述了CEM研究中的目前的游戏理论模型,旨在增强对博弈论应用在多个应用领域和项目交付系统(PDSS)内的CEM战略交互中的了解。作者分析了1998年至2019年期间采用Gametheoretic模型的87个CEM同行评审出版物。分析占CEM应用领域,利益相关者的参与,以及每个出版物中使用的游戏理论液的类型。作者对当前的赌徒相互作用进行了社会网络分析(SNA),识别在未来的研究中要解决的文学趋势和差距。与传统文献综述方法不同,SNA提供了分析现有知识体系的定量方法。研究结果证明了七个CEM应用中的游戏理论的贡献(冲突解决;谈判和谈判;合作福利的分配;治理和监督;合作与信托的演变;建设竞标;和风险分配)。通过SNA,在CEM竞标,冲突解决方案以及讨价还价和谈判中,在所有者 - 承包商游戏中找到了最高程度的中心地位。 SNA还揭示了需要进一步调查CEM利益攸关方之间的互动,而不是传统的设计出价和公私伙伴关系。此外,具有战略联盟和供应链的游戏可以提供更充分的实际相互作用的反映。 (c)2021年美国土木工程师协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号