首页> 外文期刊>Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft >Lieber gleich berechtigt als sp?ter! Comparing Women’s Rights in the United States and Germany
【24h】

Lieber gleich berechtigt als sp?ter! Comparing Women’s Rights in the United States and Germany

机译:比以后更合理!比较美国和德国的妇女权利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Neither a century of formal political rights nor more than 50 years of equal pay and employment opportunity legislation have rendered American or German women socially equal to male citizens. A legal philosophy qua Staatsr?son grounded in a concept of positive rights, sooner seen in the Federal Republic than in the United States, appears to be a necessary but not sufficient condition for producing reforms guaranteeing social equality between the sexes. While the USA initiated a “roll-back” of women’s welfare rights commencing with the Reagan years, Hartz IV reforms have only recently rendered paid employment a condition for receiving state assistance among disadvantaged women as mothers and care-takers in Germany. Both systems have ignored the intersectionality and cumulative impact of unequal social welfare treatment that block women’s access to full citizenship.
机译:无论是一百年的正式政治权利还是五十多年的同酬和就业机会立法都没有使美国或德国妇女在社会上与男性公民平等。在联邦共和国比在美国早于美国的立足于积极权利概念的一种法律哲学似乎是进行改革以确保两性平等的必要但不充分的条件。从里根时代开始,美国就开始对妇女的福利权进行“缩减”,而哈茨四世的改革直到最近才使有偿就业成为在德国处于弱势的妇女中担任母亲和照顾者的国家提供条件的条件。两种制度都忽视了不平等的社会福利待遇的交叉性和累积影响,这种待遇阻碍了妇女获得充分的公民身份。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号