首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience >Neural Biases to Covert and Overt Signals of Fear: Dissociation by Trait Anxiety and Depression
【24h】

Neural Biases to Covert and Overt Signals of Fear: Dissociation by Trait Anxiety and Depression

机译:隐性和隐性恐惧信号的神经偏见:特质焦虑和抑郁导致的解离

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Although biases toward signals of fear may be an evolutionary adaptation necessary for survival, heightened biases may be maladaptive and associated with anxiety or depression. In this study, event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to examine the time course of neural responses to facial fear stimuli (versus neutral) presented overtly (for 500 msec with conscious attention) and covertly (for 10 msec with immediate masking to preclude conscious awareness) in 257 nonclinical subjects. We also examined the impact of trait anxiety and depression, assessed using psychometric ratings, on the time course of ERPs. In the total subject group, controlled biases to overtly processed fear were reflected in an enhancement of ERPs associated with structural encoding (120-220 msec) and sustained evaluation persisting from 250 msec and beyond, following a temporo-occipital to frontal topography. By contrast, covert fear processing elicited automatic biases, reflected in an enhancement of ERPs prior to structural encoding (80- 180 msec) and again in the period associated with automatic-orienting and emotion encoding (230-330 msec), which followed the reverse frontal to temporo-occipital topography. Higher levels of trait anxiety (in the clinical range) were distinguished by a heightened bias to covert fear (speeding of early ERPs), compared to higher depression which was associated with an opposing bias to overt fear (slowing of later ERPs). Anxiety also heightened early responses to covert fear, and depression to overt fear, with subsequent deficits in emotion encoding in each case. These findings are consistent with neural biases to signals of fear which operate automatically and during controlled processing, feasibly supported by parallel networks. Heightened automatic biases in anxiety may contribute to a cycle of hypervigilance and anxious thoughts, whereas depression may represent a "burnt out" emotional state in which evaluation of fear stimuli is prolonged only when conscious attention is allocated.
机译:尽管对恐惧信号的偏见可能是生存所必需的进化适应,但偏见的加剧可能会适应不良,并与焦虑或抑郁相关。在这项研究中,使用事件相关电位(ERPs)来检查对面部恐惧刺激(相对于中性)的神经反应的时程(显性地持续500毫秒,有意识地注意)和隐性地(持续10毫秒,立即遮盖以防止出现) 257名非临床受试者。我们还检查了心理焦虑评分对特质焦虑和抑郁的影响,对ERP的时程有影响。在整个受试者组中,对颞部枕形到额叶形貌的控制与偏向性恐惧的偏见反映在与结构编码相关的ERPs增强(120-220毫秒)中,持续评估持续250毫秒及以后。相比之下,秘密恐惧处理会引起自动偏见,这反映在结构编码之前的ERP增强(80-180毫秒)中,以及与自动定向和情感编码相关的时期(230-330毫秒)中,反之则相反。颞枕地形的正面。特质焦虑水平较高(在临床范围内)的特征是对隐性恐惧的偏见加剧(早期ERP的加速),而与抑郁症较高的偏见则是对公开恐惧的偏见(后期ERP的减慢)。焦虑还增强了对隐性恐惧的早期反应,对显性恐惧的沮丧情绪在每种情况下都随之降低。这些发现与对恐惧信号的神经偏见相一致,恐惧信号在并行处理的支持下自动运行并在受控处理期间运行。焦虑中自动偏见的加剧可能会导致过度警惕和焦虑的思想循环,而抑郁可能代表“倦怠”的情绪状态,其中只有分配了有意识的注意力时,对恐惧刺激的评估才会延长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号