...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience >Differences in Electric Brain Responses to Melodies and Chords
【24h】

Differences in Electric Brain Responses to Melodies and Chords

机译:大脑对旋律和和弦的反应差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The music we usually listen to in everyday life consists of either single melodies or harmonized melodies (i.e., of melodies "accompanied" by chords). However, differences in the neural mechanisms underlying melodic and harmonic processing have remained largely unknown. Using EEG, this study compared effects of music-syntactic processing between chords and melodies. In melody blocks, sequences consisted of five tones, the final tone being either regular or irregular (p = .5). Analogously, in chord blocks, sequences consisted of five chords, the final chord function being either regular or irregular. Melodies were derived from the top voice of chord sequences, allowing a proper comparison between melodic and harmonic processing. Music-syntactic incongruities elicited an early anterior negativity with a latency of approximately 125 msec in both the melody and the chord conditions. This effect was followed in the chord condition, but not in the melody condition, by an additional negative effect that was maximal at approximately 180 msec. Both effects were maximal at frontal electrodes, but the later effect was more broadly distributed over the scalp than the earlier effect. These findings indicate that melodic information (which is also contained in the top voice of chords) is processed earlier and with partly different neural mechanisms than harmonic information of chords.
机译:我们通常在日常生活中听的音乐是由单一旋律或和声旋律组成的(即和弦“伴奏”的旋律)。但是,旋律和谐波处理所基于的神经机制的差异仍然未知。使用脑电图,这项研究比较了和弦和旋律之间的音乐句法处理效果。在旋律块中,序列由五个音调组成,最终音调为规则或不规则(p = 0.5)。类似地,在和弦块中,序列由五个和弦组成,最终的和弦功能为规则或不规则。旋律源自和弦序列的最高音,可以在旋律和和声处理之间进行适当的比较。在旋律和和弦条件下,音乐-句法上的不一致会引起早期的前消极感,潜伏期约为125毫秒。在和弦条件下(而不是在旋律条件下),此效果之后是附加的负面效果,该负面效果在大约180毫秒时最大。两种效应在额电极处均最大,但较早的效应,后一种效应在头皮上的分布更为广泛。这些发现表明,旋律信息(也包含在和弦的最高音中)被更早地处理,并且其神经机制与和弦的和声信息部分不同。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience》 |2010年第10期|p.2251-2262|共12页
  • 作者单位

    University of Sussex, Brighton, UK Max-Planck-Institute of Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstr, la, 04103 Leipzig, Germany,Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany;

    Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany,Uni-versity College London, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号