...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience >Feedback-related Negativity Codes Prediction Error but Not Behavioral Adjustment during Probabilistic Reversal Learning
【24h】

Feedback-related Negativity Codes Prediction Error but Not Behavioral Adjustment during Probabilistic Reversal Learning

机译:概率逆向学习中与反馈相关的负性代码预测错误,但不调整行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We assessed electrophysiological activity over the medialnfrontal cortex (MFC) during outcome-based behavioral adjustmentnusing a probabilistic reversal learning task. During recording,nparticipants were presented two abstract visual patterns onneach trial and had to select the stimulus rewarded on 80% ofntrials and to avoid the stimulus rewarded on 20% of trials. Thesencontingencies were reversed frequently during the experiment.nPrevious EEG work has revealed feedback-locked electrophysiologicalnresponses over the MFC (feedback-related negativity;nFRN), which correlate with the negative prediction errorn[Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. The neural basis of human errornprocessing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the errorrelatednnegativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679–709, 2002]nand which predict outcome-based adjustment of decision valuesn[Cohen, M. X., & Ranganath, C. Reinforcement learning signalsnpredict future decisions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 371–378,n2007]. Unlike previous paradigms, our paradigm enabled us tondisentangle, on the one hand, mechanisms related to the rewardnprediction error, derived from reinforcement learningn(RL) modeling, and on the other hand, mechanisms related tonexplicit rule-based adjustment of actual behavior. Our resultsndemonstrate greater FRN amplitudes with greater RL modelderivednprediction errors. Conversely expected negative outcomesnthat preceded rule-based behavioral reversal were notnaccompanied by an FRN. This pattern contrasted remarkablynwith that of the P3 amplitude, which was significantly greaternfor expected negative outcomes that preceded rule-based behavioralnreversal than for unexpected negative outcomes thatndid not precede behavioral reversal. These data suggest thatnthe FRN reflects prediction error and associated RL-based adjustmentnof decision values, whereas the P3 reflects adjustment ofnbehavior on the basis of explicit rules. ■
机译:我们使用概率逆转学习任务评估了基于结果的行为调整过程中内侧额叶皮质(MFC)的电生理活动。在录制过程中,参与者在每次试验时都呈现了两种抽象的视觉模式,并且必须选择对80%的人给予奖励的刺激,并避免对20%的试验给予奖励的刺激。在实验过程中,其相象性经常被逆转。n先前的EEG工作已经揭示了MFC上反馈锁定的电生理反应(反馈相关的负性; nFRN),与负预测误差n相关[Holroyd,CB,&Coles,MG错误处理:强化学习,多巴胺和与错误相关的阴性。 《心理评论》,第109卷,第679-709页,2002年],它预测了基于结果的决策价值调整[Cohen,M. X.,&Ranganath,C.强化学习信号n预测了未来的决策。神经科学杂志,27,371–378,n2007]。与以前的范式不同,我们的范式一方面使我们能够消除与强化学习n(RL)建模派生的奖励预测误差相关的机制,另一方面使我们能够基于基于色调重复规则的实际行为调整机制。我们的结果表明更大的FRN振幅和更大的RL模型推导预测误差。相反,在基于规则的行为逆转之前的负面预期结果并没有被FRN所伴随。这种模式与P3幅度形成鲜明对比,P3幅度对于基于规则的行为逆转之前的预期负面结果明显大于未发生行为逆转的意外负面结果。这些数据表明,FRN反映了预测误差和相关的基于RL的决策值调整,而P3反映了基于明确规则的行为调整。 ■

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号