首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience >A Match Made by Modafinil: Probability Matching in Choice Decisions and Spatial Attention
【24h】

A Match Made by Modafinil: Probability Matching in Choice Decisions and Spatial Attention

机译:Modafinil进行的匹配:选择决策中的概率匹配和空间注意

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When predicting where a target or reward will be, participants tend to choose each location commensurate with the true underlying probability (i.e., probability match). The strategy of probability matching involves independent sampling of high and low probability locations on separate trials. In contrast, models of probabilistic spatial attention hypothesize that on any given trial attention will either be weighted toward the high probability location or be distributed equally across all locations. Thus, the strategies of probabilistic sampling by choice decisions and spatial attention appear to differ with regard to low-probability events. This distinction is somewhat surprising because similar brain mechanisms (e.g., pFC-mediated cognitive control) are thought to be important in both functions. Thus, the goal of the current study was to examine the relationship between choice decisions and attentional selection within single trials to test for any strategic differences, then to determine whether that relationship is malleable to manipulations of catecholamine-modulated cognitive control with the drug modafinil. Our results demonstrate that spatial attention and choice decisions followed different strategies of probabilistic information selection on placebo, but that modafinil brought the pattern of spatial attention into alignment with that of predictive choices. Modafinil also produced earlier learning of the probability distribution. Together, these results suggest that enhancing cognitive control mechanisms (e.g., through prefrontal cortical function) leads spatial attention to follow choice decisions in selecting information according to rule-based expectations.
机译:在预测目标或奖励的位置时,参与者倾向于选择与真实潜在概率(即概率匹配)相对应的每个位置。概率匹配策略涉及在单独的试验中对高概率位置和低概率位置进行独立采样。相反,概率性空间注意力模型假设,在任何给定的试验注意力上,要么将注意力集中在高概率位置上,要么在所有位置上平均分配。因此,关于低概率事件,通过选择决策和空间注意力进行概率抽样的策略似乎有所不同。这种区别有些令人惊讶,因为相似的大脑机制(例如,pFC介导的认知控制)被认为在两种功能中都很重要。因此,本研究的目的是在一次试验中检查选择决策与注意选择之间的关系,以测试任何策略差异,然后确定该关系是否适用于莫达非尼对儿茶酚胺调节的认知控制的操纵。我们的结果表明,空间注意和选择决策遵循安慰剂上不同的概率信息选择策略,但是莫达非尼使空间注意的模式与预测性选择保持一致。莫达非尼还产生了关于概率分布的早期学习。总之,这些结果表明,增强认知控制机制(例如,通过前额叶皮层功能)可导致空间注意力在根据基于规则的期望选择信息时遵循选择决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号