首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience >The Role of the Frontal and Parietal Cortex in Proactive and Reactive Inhibitory Control: A Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Study
【24h】

The Role of the Frontal and Parietal Cortex in Proactive and Reactive Inhibitory Control: A Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Study

机译:额叶和顶叶皮层在主动和反应抑制控制中的作用:经颅直流电刺激研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Mounting evidence suggests that response inhibition involves both proactive and reactive inhibitory control, yet its underlying neural mechanisms remain elusive. In particular, the roles of the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and inferior parietal lobe (IPL) in proactive and reactive inhibitory control are still under debate. This study aimed at examining the causal role of the right IFG and IPL in proactive and reactive inhibitory control, using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and the stop signal task. Twenty-two participants completed three sessions of the stop signal task, under anodal tDCS in the right IFG, the right IPL, or the primary visual cortex (VC; 1.5 mA for 15 min), respectively. The VC stimulation served as the active control condition. The tDCS effect for each condition was calculated as the difference between pre- and post-tDCS performance. Proactive control was indexed by the RT increase for go trials (or preparatory cost), and reactive control by the stop signal RT. Compared to the VC stimulation, anodal stimulation of the right IFG, but not that of the IPL, facilitated both proactive and reactive control. However, the facilitation of reactive control was not mediated by the facilitation of proactive control. Furthermore, tDCS did not affect the intraindividual variability in go RT. These results suggest a causal role of the right IFG, but not the right IPL, in both reactive and proactive inhibitory control.
机译:越来越多的证据表明,反应抑制涉及主动和反应性抑制控制,但其潜在的神经机制仍然难以捉摸。特别是,右下额回(IFG)和顶下叶(IPL)在主动和反应性抑制控制中的作用仍在争论中。这项研究旨在研究正确的IFG和IPL在经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和停止信号任务的主动和反应性抑制控制中的因果作用。 22名参与者分别在右侧IFG,右侧IPL或初级视觉皮层(VC; 1.5 mA,持续15分钟)的阳极tDCS下完成了三个停止信号任务。 VC刺激作为主动控制条件。计算每种情况下的tDCS效果,作为tDCS之前和之后性能之间的差异。主动控制通过围棋试验(或准备成本)的RT增加来索引,而被动控制通过停止信号RT进行索引。与VC刺激相比,右侧IFG的阳极刺激而不是IPL的阳极刺激促进了主动和反应性控制。但是,反应性控制的促进不是由主动控制的促进介导的。此外,tDCS不会影响go RT中的个体差异。这些结果表明,正确的IFG而不是正确的IPL在反应性和主动性抑制控制中起因果作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号