...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Pathology >Quality assessment of Microbe Base antimicrobial susceptibility data.
【24h】

Quality assessment of Microbe Base antimicrobial susceptibility data.

机译:微生物基础抗药性数据的质量评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS--To assess the quality of centres contributing antimicrobial susceptibility data to a centralised database. METHODS--Twelve organisms were distributed to 31 regional microbiology laboratories contributing data to a centralised susceptibility database. Participants were asked to determine susceptibilities to certain antibiotics by their routine method and return the data to the Department of Microbiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, for analysis. RESULTS--Results for the overwhelming majority of organism/antibiotic combinations were in agreement with expected results. Reasons for discrepancies included the non-bimodal distribution of susceptibilities, the use of different content discs, and, more importantly, minimum inhibitory concentrations falling close to breakpoint values. CONCLUSIONS--It is inevitable that any large multicentre database will contain a degree of inaccurate data. This study has highlighted several areas where discrepant results have occurred and has enabled Glaxo Laboratories to approach individual laboratories to address this problem. This study emphasises the value and consistency of Microbe Base as the largest database, of its kind, nationally.
机译:目的-评估将抗菌药敏感性数据贡献给集中式数据库的中心的质量。方法-将十二种生物分配给31个区域微生物学实验室,将数据提供给集中化的敏感性数据库。要求参与者通过常规方法确定对某些抗生素的敏感性,然后将数据返回给谢菲尔德皇家哈兰郡医院微生物学部门进行分析。结果-绝大多数生物/抗生素组合的结果与预期结果一致。出现差异的原因包括药敏度的非双峰分布,使用不同含量的药碟,更重要的是,最低抑菌浓度接近断点值。结论-任何大型多中心数据库都不可避免地会包含一定程度的不准确数据。这项研究强调了出现不同结果的几个领域,并使葛兰素实验室能够与各个实验室联系以解决这一问题。这项研究强调了微生物库作为全国最大的数据库的价值和一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号