首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Effects of different tillage practices on the carbon footprint of wheat and maize production in the Loess Plateau of China
【24h】

Effects of different tillage practices on the carbon footprint of wheat and maize production in the Loess Plateau of China

机译:不同耕作实践对中国黄土高原小麦玉米生产碳足迹的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Appropriate tillage practices reduce a crop's carbon footprint (CF) and mitigate climate change. However, little is known about the CF of winter wheat and spring maize production under different tillage practices in the Loess Plateau of China. To quantify the tillage differences and crop type differences in CF, a field experiment was established in 2007 in which the following six tillage practices were evaluated: plow tillage (PT), no-tillage (NT), subsoil tillage (ST), PT/NT rotation, NT/ST rotation and ST/PT rotation. The results showed PT had the positive CF value (488 kg CO2-eq ha(-1)), indicating a carbon source. However, NT, ST, ST/PT, PT/NT and NT/ST significantly decreased the CF (-628, -1382, -2328, -3038 and -3545 kg CO2-eq ha(-1)), demonstrating these tillage practices served as carbon sinks. The functional unit-scaled CFs (yield-scaled CF, cost-scaled CF, production value-scaled CF and net income-scaled CF) were similar to the trend of CF, which exhibited the following order: NT/ST PT/NT ST/PT ST NT PT. The CF and functional unit-scaled CFs of winter wheat production were significantly higher than those of spring maize production. The CF and functional unit-scaled CFs decreased as planting year increased. In addition, increasing SOC storage and grain yield were benefit for decreasing CF. The results of this study showed NT/ST rotation produced the highest grain yield and SOC storage with the lowest CF and functional unit-scaled CFs and was thus determined to be the best tillage practice for balancing sustainable production with the environment in the Loess Plateau. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:适当的耕作措施减少了作物的碳足迹(CF)并减轻气候变化。然而,在中国黄土高原的不同耕作实践下,关于冬小麦和春季玉米产量的CF很少。为了量化CF的耕作差异和作物类型差异,在2007年建立了田间实验,其中评估了以下六种耕作实践:犁耕(Pt),无耕作(NT),脱耕(ST),Pt / NT旋转,NT / ST旋转和ST / PT旋转。结果显示PT的阳性CF值(488kg CO2-EQ HA(-1)),表明碳源。然而,NT,ST,ST / Pt,Pt / NT和NT / St显着降低了CF(-628,-1382,-2328,-3038和-3545kg CO2-EQ HA(-1)),证明了这些耕作实践用作碳汇。功能单元缩放的CFS(产量缩放CF,成本缩放的CF,生产值缩放的CF和净收入缩放的CF)与CF的趋势类似,呈现以下顺序:NT / ST> Pt / NT > ST / PT> ST> NT> Pt。冬小麦生产的CF和功能性单位缩放的CFS显着高于春玉米生产。由于种植年增加,CF和功能单位缩放的CFS减少。此外,增加SoC储存和谷物产量是有益的降低CF。该研究的结果表明,NT / ST旋转产生了最高的CF和功能单位缩放CFS的最高谷物产量和SOC储存,因此决心是平衡黄土高原环境中的环境的最佳耕作实践。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2019年第10期|297-305|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Northwest A&F Univ Coll Nat Resources & Environm Yangling 712100 Shaanxi Peoples R China;

    Northwest A&F Univ Coll Nat Resources & Environm Yangling 712100 Shaanxi Peoples R China;

    Northwest A&F Univ Coll Nat Resources & Environm Yangling 712100 Shaanxi Peoples R China|Minist Agr Key Lab Plant Nutr & Agrienvironm Northwest China Yangling 712100 Shaanxi Peoples R China;

    Northwest A&F Univ Coll Agron Yangling 712100 Shaanxi Peoples R China;

    Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agr Univ Dept Soil Sci & Soil Water Conservat Rawalpindi Pakistan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Carbon footprint; Tillage practices; Soil organic carbon storage; Yield; Winter wheat; Spring maize;

    机译:碳足迹;耕作实践;土壤有机碳储存;产量;冬小麦;春玉米;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号