首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Economic and environmental impacts of the recycling system in Portugal
【24h】

Economic and environmental impacts of the recycling system in Portugal

机译:葡萄牙回收系统的经济和环境影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Directive 94/62/EC on Packaging and Packaging Waste led to new major investments in infrastructure and equipment for waste management in Portugal to cope with the imposed recycling and recovery targets. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the economic rate of return of the enhanced environmental protection achieved with the implementation of the recycling scheme. Therefore, we calculated, compared, and contrasted all economic and environmental costs and benefits involved in the Portuguese packaging waste recycling system. The economic-financial and environmental assessments were developed based on data collected from the operators in charge of the municipal waste management operations. The same system boundary was used in both assessments. The environmental impacts were quantified through a Life Cycle Assessment and, then, converted into monetary values by means of three environmental valuation methods: Ecovalue08, Eco-costs2012 and Stepwise2006. We concluded that globally, the benefits surpassed the costs for the three valuation methods. The overall cost coverage ranges between 137% and 196% if the "avoided costs" component is considered. In fact, the refuse collection and waste disposal operations proved to be more costly (mainly in the environmental perspective) than the activities which prepare waste for recycling. The "avoided costs" component assumes an important role in promoting the efficiency of the Portuguese waste management operators (local authorities), reducing their economic costs and also the environmental damage.
机译:关于包装和包装废物的指令94/62 / EC导致了葡萄牙对废物管理的基础设施和设备的新的重大投资,以应对所设定的回收和回收目标。本研究的目的是评估通过实施回收计划实现的增强型环境保护的经济回报率。因此,我们计算,比较和对比了葡萄牙包装废物回收系统涉及的所有经济和环境成本与收益。根据从负责市政废物管理业务的运营商收集的数据,进行了经济,财务和环境评估。两次评估均使用相同的系统边界。通过生命周期评估对环境影响进行量化,然后通过三种环境评估方法将其转化为货币价值:Ecovalue08,Eco-costs2012和Stepwise2006。我们得出的结论是,在全球范围内,三种评估方法的收益都超过了成本。如果考虑“避免的成本”部分,则总的成本覆盖范围在137%至196%之间。实际上,事实证明,垃圾收集和废物处理操作比准备废物以进行再循环的活动的成本更高(主要是从环境角度出发)。 “回避成本”部分在提高葡萄牙废物管理经营者(地方当局)的效率,降低其经济成本以及环境破坏方面起着重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号