...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >A comparison between microalgae virtual biorefinery arrangements for bio-oil production based on lab-scale results
【24h】

A comparison between microalgae virtual biorefinery arrangements for bio-oil production based on lab-scale results

机译:基于实验室规模结果的用于生物油生产的微藻虚拟生物精炼厂安排之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Bio-oils are typically produced by pyrolysis processes. Bio-oils can be used directly in a generator to produce electricity or upgraded to produce transportation fuels. Nowadays the interest is that they come out in a biorefinery context. This paper compares bio-oil production within three possible procedures. Targeting the bio-oil product, in virtual biorefinery #1, microalgae is processed by solvent ultrasound assisted extraction, and lipids follow transesterification; in virtual biorefinery #2, bio-oil comes out from fresh microalgae pyrolysis, and, finally, in virtual biorefinery #3, lipid extraction leftovers proceed for slow pyrolysis. Solvent ultrasound-assisted extraction and slow pyrolysis are tested and measured experimentally using three microalgae as feedstock: Chlorella vulgaris, Nannochloropsis oculata, and Scenedesmus obliquus. These stand-alone processes are analyzed aiming to provide the best option in a virtual biorefinery context. Although very fast/slow pyrolysis produces markedly different products, previous thermogravimetry analysis allowed choosing an adequate pyrolysis temperature. Nevertheless, the influence of temperature, catalyst and nitrogen flow is depicted. The comparison indicators for final remarks relate to final energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Conditions that favor bio-oil production may not be favorable in terms of energy required per mass or energy output. If mass allocation criterion is used lipid extraction followed by slow pyrolysis of the leftovers is advantageous over slow pyrolysis of fresh dry microalgae. Still the fossil energy input largely surpasses the bio-oil energy content. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:生物油通常通过热解过程生产。生物油可直接用于发电机中以发电,也可进行提质以生产运输燃料。如今,人们感兴趣的是它们是在生物精炼厂中出现的。本文在三种可能的程序中比较了生物油的生产。针对生物油产品,在虚拟生物提炼厂1中,微藻类通过溶剂超声辅助提取进行处理,脂质跟随酯交换反应进行;在虚拟的生物提炼厂#2中,生物油来自新鲜的微藻热解,最后,在虚拟的生物提炼厂#3中,脂质提取剩余物进行缓慢的热解。使用三种微藻作为原料,对溶剂超声辅助萃取和慢速热解进行了实验和测量,这两种藻分别为小球藻,纳氏绿藻和斜生藻。对这些独立过程进行了分析,旨在在虚拟生物精炼厂环境中提供最佳选择。尽管非常快/慢的热解产生明显不同的产物,但是先前的热重分析可以选择合适的热解温度。然而,描绘了温度,催化剂和氮气流量的影响。最后说明的比较指标涉及最终能源消耗和温室气体排放。就每质量所需的能量或能量输出而言,有利于生物油生产的条件可能并不有利。如果使用质量分配标准,则脂质提取后剩余物的缓慢热解优于新鲜干微藻的缓慢热解。化石能源输入仍然大大超过生物油能源含量。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号