首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >A comparative study on carbon footprints between plant- and animal-based foods in China
【24h】

A comparative study on carbon footprints between plant- and animal-based foods in China

机译:中国动植物食品碳足迹的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Agriculture supplies human with foods, and were considered as a crucial source of artificial greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Life-cycle carbon footprint (CF) could represent the comprehensive GHG emissions from foods, and attracted attentions from researchers. Previous studies had evaluated the CFs of quite a few foods including both plant- and animal-based products. However, the huge differences from system boundary definition, emission factors limited the comparability of the reported CF results. A few studies had tried to evaluate and compare the CFs of some plant products or animal products. However, the CF comparisons between plant- and animal-based foods were rarely reported. Here we used a consistent methodology, including unique life cycle definitions, identical data sources, and same byproducts allocation method to calculate CFs of 22 plant-based foods and 6 animal-based foods, as well as some processed foods. The results showed that the animal-based foods had greater CFs than the plant-based foods in general. Beef and mutton emitted more GHGs than the other foods, and the lowest CF was observed in the radish production. Manufacturing and field emissions were major parts of the CFs for the plant-based foods. The CF compositions varied in different animal-based foods. Daily dietary GHG emission of Chinese was 0.84 kg CO2/capita. China had emitted more than 427.64 Tg CO2 from dietary in 2013. Through measuring the impact of different foods on global warming, and quantifying the CF differences of various foods, this study can help to improve the comparability of the CF between plant- and animal-based foods. The results offered an instruction for GHG mitigation through choosing foods with lower CFs. The methodology developed in this study can also be used as a reference for the CF comparisons among different products. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:农业为人类提供食物,被认为是人造温室气体(GHG)排放的重要来源。生命周期的碳足迹(CF)可以代表食物中温室气体的综合排放量,并引起研究人员的关注。先前的研究已经评估了包括植物和动物产品在内的相当多种食物的CFs。但是,与系统边界定义,排放因子的巨大差异限制了所报告CF结果的可比性。一些研究试图评估和比较某些植物产品或动物产品的CF。但是,鲜有关于以植物和动物为基础的食物之间的CF对比的报道。在这里,我们使用一致的方法,包括独特的生命周期定义,相同的数据源和相同的副产品分配方法来计算22种植物性食品和6种动物性食品以及某些加工食品的CF。结果表明,一般而言,动物性食品的CFs高于植物性食品。牛肉和羊肉比其他食物排放更多的温室气体,萝卜生产中的碳含量最低。制造业和现场排放是植物性食品的CF的主要组成部分。 CF成分在不同的动物性食品中也有所不同。中国人的日常饮食温室气体排放量为0.84千克二氧化碳/人均。 2013年,中国从饮食中排放的二氧化碳超过427.64 Tg。通过测量不同食物对全球变暖的影响,并量化各种食物的CF差异,本研究可以帮助改善动植物之间CF的可比性。基础食品。结果为选择低CFs的食物提供了减少温室气体的指导。本研究中开发的方法还可以用作不同产品之间CF比较的参考。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号