...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Using a gate-to-gate LCA to apply circular economy principles to a food processing SME
【24h】

Using a gate-to-gate LCA to apply circular economy principles to a food processing SME

机译:使用门到门LCA将循环经济原理应用于食品加工中小企业

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to assess: what are the circular economy opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) in the meat processing sector to reduce their environmental impacts, using Life cycle assessment (LCA) as the analytical method to prevent burden shifting; whether current life cycle inventories and LCA studies adequately represent SMEs such as the study plant; and whether climate change is a suitable proxy for impacts.Life cycle inventory data from a SME meat processing site in regional Australia was used for benchmarking with existing industry data and for risk and opportunity identification along the supply chain. A LCA was conducted of the current operation and possible future energy supply scenarios involving the use of tallow, wastewater methane and biomass production, to identify the best performing option as part of a PhD project on SMEs and sustainability in agribusiness value chains. System expansion was used to handle all coproducts and byproducts. The area of land required to produce biomass was calculated and was compared to the catchment area for livestock, and an estimate was made of the non-arable land area required to produce biomass to offset all greenhouse emissions for the supply chain. Inventory data and LCA results for this SME were significantly different to previous LCAs. The system expansion resulted in large credits, particularly for edible offal. Climate change may not be a suitable proxy for other midpoint impact categories due to the difference in contributing processes. The best future energy appeared to be the biomass scenario, which involved using tallow for biodiesel production, capturing methane generated in the onsite wastewater treatment system for electricity generation, using tallow to generate the remaining electricity needs and using biomass for thermal energy production. Less than 0.5% of the non-arable land area required for producing the livestock for the plant was needed for biomass production, and if all supply chain emissions were offset using biomass, the land area required was 12% for life time grass fed beef. The potential for supply chain integration in the red meat sector appears promising, particularly in terms of offsets from biomethane use for electricity production, tallow use for biodiesel production and biomass production for thermal energy use. Life cycle assessment is a useful tool to screen circular economy options and identify the best future scenario, although a wide range of impact categories should be assessed as climate change may not be a suitable proxy. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估:使用生命周期评估(LCA)作为防止负担的分析方法,肉类加工行业的中小型企业(SME)减少其环境影响的循环经济机会是什么?转移当前的生命周期清单和LCA研究是否足以代表中小型企业(如研究工厂);来自澳大利亚地区中小型企业肉类加工厂的生命周期清单数据被用于与现有行业数据进行基准比较,并用于识别供应链中的风险和机会。对当前的运营以及可能的未来能源供应情景(包括使用牛脂,废水甲烷和生物质生产)进行了生命周期评估,以找出表现最佳的选择,作为有关中小型企业和农业综合价值链可持续性的博士项目的一部分。系统扩展用于处理所有副产品和副产品。计算产生生物质所需的土地面积,并将其与牲畜集水区进行比较,并对产生生物质以抵消供应链中所有温室气体排放所需的非耕地面积进行估算。该中小企业的库存数据和LCA结果与以前的LCA显着不同。系统的扩展产生了很大的信誉,特别是在食用杂碎方面。由于贡献过程的差异,气候变化可能无法替代其他中点影响类别。未来最好的能源似乎是生物质情景,其中包括使用牛脂生产生物柴油,捕获现场废水处理系统中产生的甲烷用于发电,使用牛脂产生剩余的电力需求以及将生物质用于热能生产。生产生物量所需的牲畜不到耕地面积的0.5%,如果使用生物质来抵消所有供应链的排放,则终身饲喂草饲牛肉所需的土地面积为12%。红肉部门的供应链整合潜力似乎令人鼓舞,尤其是在抵消生物甲烷用于发电,牛脂用于生物柴油生产以及生物质用于热能的抵消方面。生命周期评估是筛选循环经济方案和确定最佳未来方案的有用工具,尽管应评估各种影响类别,因为气候变化可能不是合适的替代方法。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号